{"id":"W2992033119","doi":"","title":"Current status of Cuban threatened birds: Case studies of conservation programs","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Caribbean Ornithology","topic":"Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Threatened species; Geography; Ecology; Conservation status; Near-threatened species; Habitat; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018326,0.0002455373,0.0001322259,0.001544768,0.002932854,0.001376982,0.0008662909,0.0005479635,0.001652439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002410552,0.0001713744,0.0001566462,0.002262455,0.0008710992,0.000631513,0.00133956,0.0005048306,0.00010151],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005961447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002747792,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2198251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4315311,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999233,0.0003619166,0.0000459827,0.00004416799,0.00009038101,0.0002245784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978986,0.0005360034,0.0005737836,0.00008776692,0.000494124,0.000409801],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003670906,0.0008072709,0.8664253,0.0008290593,0.00008299266,0.01415331,0.04475678,0.0006244719,0.001208785,0.001627744,0.004200396,0.06491664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000175654,0.0003029857,0.8345391,0.0004991938,0.00007257531,0.005115302,0.1402241,0.0007269564,0.0005223933,0.0001829,0.01777383,0.00002323641],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910613,0.001662816,0.00009520249,0.0005208784,0.000009792061,0.00008350937,0.0002012517,0.000005194249,0.006360202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958494,0.001827868,0.0002821897,0.0001139985,0.000007813331,0.00007698328,0.0001826416,0.000002215551,0.001656753],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2198251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4370911,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09040115015847777,"score_gpt":0.3460184624160499,"score_spread":0.2556173122575721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}