{"id":"W2992062686","doi":"","title":"Empirical Analysis on the International Competitiveness Of Shannxi Agricultural Product 1 ANALYSE EMPIRIQUE DE LA COMPETITIVITE INTERNATIONALE DU PRODUIT AGRICOLE DU SHANNXI","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Global Trade and Competitiveness","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative advantage; Index (typography); Agriculture; Revealed comparative advantage; Product (mathematics); Competition (biology); Competitive advantage; Position (finance); Economics; Regional science; International trade; Geography; Mathematics; Management; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001803516,0.0003060261,0.0003855977,0.0006945382,0.0009255836,0.0009960581,0.001472538,0.0001132251,0.0008337731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004536207,0.0002517666,0.0003275771,0.004720637,0.001763065,0.0009247316,0.0002230242,0.0002918204,0.0000608598],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001383286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008679446,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06622179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06700158,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971202,0.0001834883,0.0004195377,0.0006712766,0.0009099449,0.0006955436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978195,0.0002555735,0.0003487868,0.0002186712,0.001254777,0.000102659],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001181151,0.000184943,0.7647448,0.00003170858,0.0001678874,0.00003840265,0.000194958,0.0005252896,0.0004338535,0.2314135,0.00199834,0.0002544838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001710462,0.000009183668,0.7853839,0.0000976279,0.0001945278,0.000006437404,0.00118343,0.0009990531,0.0003365102,0.0005425529,0.2108086,0.0002670825],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7082955,0.0002020389,0.00008630563,0.04398731,0.0007978004,0.0003148417,0.0002367232,0.00002849222,0.246051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993052,0.00001765126,0.00002874756,0.002341936,0.002626168,0.00003714088,0.0001160205,0.00001364753,0.001766692],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2847565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999934,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01442633695957149,"score_gpt":0.2413354286679459,"score_spread":0.2269090917083744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}