{"id":"W2992062686","doi":"","title":"Empirical Analysis on the International Competitiveness Of Shannxi Agricultural Product 1 ANALYSE EMPIRIQUE DE LA COMPETITIVITE INTERNATIONALE DU PRODUIT AGRICOLE DU SHANNXI","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Global Trade and Competitiveness","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative advantage; Index (typography); Agriculture; Revealed comparative advantage; Product (mathematics); Competition (biology); Competitive advantage; Position (finance); Economics; Regional science; International trade; Geography; Mathematics; Management; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007020369,0.0001879029,0.0001785258,0.002605236,0.0005610785,0.001037047,0.0002162096,0.0001695148,0.001909723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001077653,0.0001069494,0.0002994513,0.004403484,0.0005035947,0.0008411029,0.000355655,0.0003020827,0.0001460453],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002367347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001583968,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04116944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05328026,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996829,0.00004012646,0.0000230386,0.00005977006,0.0001247081,0.0000695202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990824,0.0002544035,0.0002644086,0.00003626935,0.000281421,0.0000810824],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004027344,0.00003631407,0.9820991,0.00004101453,0.00002653188,0.0003270714,0.001362633,0.001737786,0.0005603208,0.001986191,0.0003313934,0.01145127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001407087,0.0000440484,0.99247,0.00001514112,0.00001418986,0.0000748064,0.002636483,0.002521061,0.0003109706,0.0001623797,0.001741971,0.000007432642],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945701,0.0001020584,0.0001106102,0.00002610539,0.000001148287,0.000005630056,0.0001651254,0.000001659381,0.005017581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986676,0.0001068041,0.0001162268,0.000003324557,0.00000128581,0.000004783675,0.0003450116,0.000001026693,0.0007540019],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04116944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08185959,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01442633695957149,"score_gpt":0.2413354286679459,"score_spread":0.2269090917083744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}