{"id":"W2992157477","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v36i1.183525","title":"Understanding Academic Misconduct","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":202,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Academic integrity; Honour; Higher education; Academic community; Learning development; Psychology; Scientific misconduct; Institutional research; Quality (philosophy); Public relations; Academic achievement; Cheating; Political science; Sociology; Medical education; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Law; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007031953,0.00005123379,0.00007833249,0.000212806,0.0003586422,0.00005161171,0.0002045918,0.0003245568,0.001203422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008421655,0.00005109792,0.00004243644,0.0001891875,0.0001440519,0.0003135376,0.000001407558,0.0008739298,0.00002471252],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009670439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005876259,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07119426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03866799,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992127,0.0001109827,0.0002140742,0.00005664692,0.0001728497,0.0002327368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992859,0.00006490906,0.0001673878,0.00004149246,0.0001332462,0.0003070718],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001500938,0.000004850516,0.01894121,0.000002345983,0.000005453239,0.000003519699,0.003014731,0.00001036261,0.00006582111,0.3744079,0.6032875,0.000254857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005086556,0.000007146386,0.006956492,0.00004167276,0.00001370213,0.00001126696,0.003879268,3.289542e-7,0.00003348675,0.1105009,0.8784381,0.00006670242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3604993,0.01379624,0.000588603,0.09048199,0.0161174,0.0002007953,0.000009567629,0.00001976772,0.5182863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9639372,0.00003342493,0.0001357679,0.0008158576,0.002736551,5.358227e-7,0.000002574989,0.000005115227,0.03233293],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.603438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997595,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1112233258088078,"score_gpt":0.3427327548328886,"score_spread":0.2315094290240808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}