{"id":"W2992303617","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2019-0191","title":"Developing a two-level fire regime zonation system for Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Environmental science; Scale (ratio); Homogeneity (statistics); Range (aeronautics); Vegetation (pathology); Fire regime; Physical geography; Meteorology; Environmental resource management; Geography; Climatology; Ecology; Cartography; Geology; Statistics; Mathematics; Ecosystem; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001801836,0.0004694484,0.0003950632,0.00721589,0.002064388,0.002510903,0.001140446,0.0003620021,0.00375836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005002916,0.0003894,0.0009711579,0.005663954,0.0007272332,0.0008925663,0.001677341,0.0007003476,0.000443664],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02217509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03163461,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9337174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9586173,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989783,0.0001259686,0.0001006445,0.0002181988,0.0003686665,0.0002083384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967052,0.000313067,0.0002437131,0.0001672759,0.002340725,0.0002300019],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002897657,0.0001929751,0.323785,0.000961995,0.0003906717,0.0004354561,0.006084456,0.1309355,0.0121284,0.07456593,0.03697122,0.4132586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011436,0.0001246181,0.3167829,0.0004591836,0.0002401543,0.0002177764,0.006738818,0.4742192,0.007134538,0.02004149,0.1736575,0.0002693358],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3556493,0.0008218121,0.5325006,0.002285783,0.0001121462,0.005758219,0.04454114,0.006387718,0.05194341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.328819,0.0002411007,0.6478307,0.0001017909,0.000009284006,0.001053102,0.01628336,0.0001708497,0.005490835],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06628257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1608923,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04073476431395634,"score_gpt":0.2828409020999156,"score_spread":0.2421061377859593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}