{"id":"W2992791472","doi":"10.2175/193864700785150448","title":"COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF METHODOLOGIES FOR MEASURING WATERSHED IMPERVIOUSNESS","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation","topic":"Aquatic and Environmental Studies","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","keywords":"Watershed; Environmental science; Hydrology (agriculture); Computer science; Geology; Geotechnical engineering; Computer vision","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003239488,0.0001018186,0.0002759218,0.00003615519,0.0002068598,0.00001999925,0.0001370612,0.0000313199,0.001002485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005607988,0.00004837701,0.0001207318,0.00005798028,0.0001256103,0.0001420775,0.00001995673,0.00003028652,0.00001170275],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009132656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000001027069,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001427894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002498192,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992438,0.00001553493,0.0002423337,0.0001596951,0.0001960926,0.0001425483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997891,0.00004224186,0.00008831918,0.00005420101,0.000008355823,0.00001782413],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003754534,0.00007707188,0.7407416,0.0001028957,0.001566277,5.552715e-8,0.0167258,0.1565756,0.06335454,0.00004532867,0.0001106339,0.02032477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002714281,0.0001270341,0.5539055,0.000009161915,0.0006618887,4.209737e-7,0.002077252,0.01690887,0.4245852,0.0008612895,0.0004413775,0.0001505993],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976153,0.0000450879,0.0004852909,0.000221334,0.00001898076,0.0002669269,0.00001694606,0.000006758381,0.001323375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954907,0.00006556948,0.003995064,0.00002173533,0.00001210448,0.000007608805,0.00003084728,0.000001701005,0.0003746414],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3612306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999107,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05720424951422125,"score_gpt":0.2356267620631735,"score_spread":0.1784225125489523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}