{"id":"W2993602017","doi":"10.1186/s12913-019-4720-y","title":"Developing an adapted Charlson comorbidity index for ischemic stroke outcome studies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Health Services Research","topic":"Acute Ischemic Stroke Management","field":"Medicine","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Institute for Work & Health; Public Health Ontario","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Ontario Stroke Network; Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care","keywords":"Medicine; Charlson comorbidity index; Comorbidity; Proportional hazards model; Hazard ratio; Cohort; Statistic; Emergency medicine; Stroke (engine); Internal medicine; Statistics; Confidence interval","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02301195,0.0008652209,0.001131947,0.005230707,0.0004995967,0.001660151,0.001308223,0.0004936716,0.001228423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06701668,0.0003693477,0.002566774,0.004950531,0.0002250202,0.0008198457,0.001659404,0.0009990899,0.0003794015],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002429241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005454223,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01576027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02319124,"domain_scores_codex":[0.987694,0.005409239,0.002329372,0.0009376874,0.003290494,0.00033912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9745443,0.006256921,0.005326055,0.002055993,0.01090237,0.0009143155],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004075622,0.0001420958,0.747524,0.00124842,0.00390594,0.0002207354,0.0001920443,0.01209615,0.0005643378,0.002786298,0.03268516,0.1982273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004704269,0.0007494436,0.8349872,0.001445185,0.002198385,0.0006388519,0.0003526043,0.1050843,0.001023606,0.01240307,0.04044599,0.0002011044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.4381192,0.01740727,0.4589954,0.007802682,0.002122611,0.01299716,0.0460492,0.001922593,0.01458391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6250094,0.004053466,0.3361312,0.001277495,0.0005267668,0.009867482,0.02186049,0.0001782953,0.001095382],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02301195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1217003,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2279456160802612,"score_gpt":0.5004229103154643,"score_spread":0.2724772942352031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}