{"id":"W2993617038","doi":"10.16997/jdd.160","title":"Synthesising the outputs of deliberation: Extracting meaningful results from a public forum","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Framing (construction); Legitimacy; Thematic analysis; Set (abstract data type); Political science; Public relations; Epistemology; Sociology; Qualitative research; Computer science; Social science; Law; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07874642,0.002515011,0.002095002,0.02122669,0.003692551,0.0147907,0.002806206,0.002747515,0.006067507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2068235,0.001027555,0.002425919,0.01939285,0.008623987,0.0149249,0.01134073,0.002885144,0.003007252],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004162046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007293236,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001506385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00171002,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9187287,0.05887938,0.006703142,0.004452662,0.009614718,0.001621321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7030827,0.2480755,0.01243235,0.01788156,0.01704804,0.001479799],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00086745,0.000291445,0.01395139,0.01564794,0.0005251606,0.002409053,0.4564871,0.005456839,0.009087243,0.1048105,0.01578926,0.3746767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002179999,0.0004894293,0.01787632,0.0125887,0.0005890782,0.0006375198,0.2777008,0.01135626,0.01356493,0.4309553,0.2334841,0.000539575],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2381183,0.007831243,0.6374174,0.01375799,0.001702501,0.007083985,0.01843641,0.001893555,0.07375854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4343866,0.003837402,0.5321602,0.001067848,0.0005758197,0.008006501,0.01184622,0.001148904,0.006970583],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07874642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4164559,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04919299678980261,"score_gpt":0.3164352843833619,"score_spread":0.2672422875935593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}