{"id":"W2993629257","doi":"10.1080/08435243.2000.10702745","title":"A comparison of sampling methods for measuring residual stand damage from commercial thinning.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Forest Engineering","topic":"Forest Biomass Utilization and Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"Oregon State University; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Thinning; Residual; Sampling (signal processing); Logging; Environmental science; Sample (material); Plot (graphics); Forestry; Computer science; Statistics; Agricultural engineering; Engineering; Mathematics; Geography; Algorithm; Telecommunications; Detector","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01622798,0.0009698513,0.0006573109,0.00322148,0.0004346684,0.000724322,0.001462608,0.0008970842,0.0006726579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02806636,0.0007231895,0.0005522528,0.001716065,0.0004287167,0.0008474252,0.0007779528,0.0005089435,0.000425607],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006417707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000664357,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003837317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01352784,"domain_scores_codex":[0.980371,0.006807398,0.001300944,0.001523091,0.009710249,0.0002873282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9634645,0.01969594,0.003174432,0.002064061,0.01104732,0.0005537226],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004384445,0.0009400919,0.2644155,0.003031004,0.0009648788,0.0002578652,0.002236314,0.003437957,0.09513789,0.000756051,0.002267254,0.6221708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005883607,0.01043809,0.835737,0.0008200026,0.001374143,0.002943412,0.001889954,0.03650126,0.09108635,0.001461821,0.01677949,0.0003801199],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7033674,0.0115607,0.2715679,0.0003232844,0.0006878274,0.003697934,0.001810562,0.0007966947,0.006187749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4912611,0.005170725,0.4948226,0.0002821091,0.0001296239,0.003101061,0.001922207,0.0001371774,0.003173482],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01622798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08582276,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05386836563543992,"score_gpt":0.3698464321147164,"score_spread":0.3159780664792765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}