{"id":"W299398132","doi":"10.18584/iipj.2015.6.1.6","title":"No Jordan’s Principle Cases in Canada? A Review of the Administrative Response to Jordan’s Principle","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Indigenous Policy Journal","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Royal Bank of Canada; McGill University; UNICEF","keywords":"Indigenous; Legislature; Denial; Administrative law; Political science; Public administration; Law; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003312263,0.0004458991,0.001426897,0.0002847685,0.000756008,0.0001296896,0.002119057,0.0001688118,0.0002299628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0151893,0.0002902174,0.0005180484,0.0008693872,0.0002299039,0.0001851612,0.0004250623,0.0009968191,0.00005768264],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01916911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0577601,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.868564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9344549,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9932004,0.0019985,0.001581445,0.0003398565,0.002147833,0.000731987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949895,0.0009998898,0.001620714,0.0003054629,0.001616473,0.0004679275],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001051018,0.001377701,0.002929309,0.03250539,0.005009565,0.003237925,0.1916987,0.00006478797,0.000003711687,0.01752033,0.08867588,0.6559256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001434656,0.00007307282,0.000374861,0.0253314,0.0000916846,0.0003022691,0.001259173,1.449062e-7,7.737457e-7,0.00006085413,0.9720647,0.0002975733],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003413369,0.9812163,3.774394e-7,0.00457333,0.001422121,0.002131337,0.0006073989,0.00001144722,0.006624391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001143459,0.991064,0.0001014377,0.0009065106,0.001450039,0.0001350799,0.00001157805,0.00003432047,0.005153552],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8833888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999955,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1281705486883464,"score_gpt":0.465804425455433,"score_spread":0.3376338767670867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}