{"id":"W2994223600","doi":"10.1002/em.22351","title":"Quantitative Interpretation of Genetic Toxicity Dose‐Response Data for Risk Assessment and Regulatory Decision‐Making: Current Status and Emerging Priorities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis","topic":"Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Health Canada","funders":"Health Canada; Government of Canada","keywords":"Risk assessment; Interpretation (philosophy); Risk analysis (engineering); Current (fluid); Toxicity; Toxicology; Computational biology; Biology; Business; Computer science; Medicine; Engineering; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003049976,0.0001801509,0.0002023615,0.00005729741,0.00008854341,0.00002894805,0.00009879471,0.00006683102,0.000009799967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000326158,0.0001798863,0.00005058972,0.00002423087,0.0001406676,0.00001445339,0.0004626033,0.00005192037,4.800735e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002805784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003893174,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000762839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007280656,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987415,0.0001261012,0.0002462007,0.0005352849,0.0001660106,0.0001848746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992866,0.00007757598,0.0001443468,0.0004005703,0.00001244564,0.0000784534],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007891399,0.00007047494,0.07047325,0.00007625873,0.0001056509,0.000001527793,0.0001914841,0.0001491217,0.8734805,0.00003530895,0.00001137974,0.05461589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00123951,0.001089845,0.9362739,0.00005857938,0.0001550074,0.00001100916,0.0009560946,0.007385433,0.05079967,0.0001880016,0.001499893,0.0003429978],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9606243,0.01009449,0.02818186,0.00001520688,0.0000723162,0.0004966264,0.0005071444,0.000003454259,0.000004626042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834009,0.002910738,0.0134454,0.00004260727,0.00001244832,0.00002281388,0.000132755,0.00002142818,0.00001085813],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8658007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7335551,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01025522023104827,"score_gpt":0.3015220984734578,"score_spread":0.2912668782424095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}