{"id":"W2994223600","doi":"10.1002/em.22351","title":"Quantitative Interpretation of Genetic Toxicity Dose‐Response Data for Risk Assessment and Regulatory Decision‐Making: Current Status and Emerging Priorities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis","topic":"Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Health Canada","funders":"Health Canada; Government of Canada","keywords":"Risk assessment; Interpretation (philosophy); Risk analysis (engineering); Current (fluid); Toxicity; Toxicology; Computational biology; Biology; Business; Computer science; Medicine; Engineering; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1534534,0.002947777,0.005084497,0.00741435,0.001119619,0.01662186,0.01229007,0.00605464,0.008810018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1259589,0.001290493,0.002617072,0.005871444,0.009442572,0.01428252,0.004865,0.009915724,0.003203535],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007164763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0162778,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007856732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005998345,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9537994,0.02774081,0.002958485,0.002973666,0.01186343,0.00066427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7254999,0.1804602,0.01631137,0.01620052,0.05832637,0.003201672],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003518107,0.0005957662,0.004959461,0.008423799,0.0003739851,0.0001660744,0.0007720118,0.0170268,0.005079466,0.1766363,0.03444237,0.7511721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001786885,0.0007337415,0.00379832,0.01491525,0.000415241,0.0003670424,0.002629449,0.05304125,0.007736139,0.5135997,0.4019963,0.0005889356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.008172506,0.2432011,0.6377535,0.0773887,0.003438893,0.0009263912,0.002886337,0.002410471,0.02382205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0897352,0.2225715,0.6607079,0.01305792,0.003721284,0.001651918,0.00402823,0.0009556545,0.00357039],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1534534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8115491,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01025522023104827,"score_gpt":0.3015220984734578,"score_spread":0.2912668782424095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}