{"id":"W2994663156","doi":"10.1002/sim.8416","title":"A flexible copula‐based approach for the analysis of secondary phenotypes in ascertained samples","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Statistics in Medicine","topic":"Genetic Associations and Epidemiology","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Jewish General Hospital; Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University Health Centre; Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute","funders":"Medical Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Copula (linguistics); Computer science; Statistics; Phenotype; Econometrics; Mathematics; Biology; Genetics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008368627,0.00008524276,0.0003447997,0.0001413728,0.00002045228,0.000001604368,0.0001350619,0.00008712959,0.00008669442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000925033,0.00005980714,0.0000430519,0.0003060248,0.00009668115,6.446941e-7,0.00002262935,0.00007556781,4.368843e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001622927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007640418,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004763055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007379503,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991195,0.00008786078,0.000345523,0.0001993589,0.00008195289,0.0001657865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990248,0.0004937574,0.0001302478,0.0002508863,0.000078587,0.00002170461],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003937753,0.0002097602,0.8029227,0.0002308129,0.001008303,8.666672e-7,0.0005103915,0.1457785,0.01616515,0.007753928,0.009964212,0.01506166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003075331,0.0005491507,0.7734296,0.00002144643,0.000473089,3.947601e-7,0.001180836,0.2129764,0.0005444898,0.002451255,0.005105051,0.0001928977],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.177002,0.001014451,0.8196152,0.0004313051,0.0001151242,0.0005127528,0.0004533825,0.000003135513,0.0008526556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9471685,0.0000799765,0.05055159,0.000356698,0.0000428955,0.00004416257,0.0015112,0.000008313493,0.0002367027],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7701665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2438864,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02402224802488427,"score_gpt":0.3229461029495333,"score_spread":0.298923854924649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}