{"id":"W2994814799","doi":"10.1086/707616","title":"Understanding Partisan Cue Receptivity: Tests of Predictions from the Bounded Rationality and Expressive Utility Perspectives","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit van Amsterdam; European Commission; Rijksuniversiteit Groningen; York University; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Receptivity; Bounded rationality; Cognitive resource theory; Cognition; Rationality; Psychology; Social psychology; Resource (disambiguation); Identity (music); Cognitive load; Politics; Cognitive psychology; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02189631,0.0005012686,0.000667016,0.001431457,0.0006384532,0.002795848,0.0008547006,0.001626894,0.004755346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1133702,0.0005643562,0.0008405737,0.0006991472,0.003360442,0.004325237,0.003182208,0.001628406,0.0003457949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005983032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007432193,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001760553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001022417,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934511,0.004161351,0.0003343618,0.0007780812,0.0007988104,0.0004763267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8360281,0.1326606,0.01619394,0.01028945,0.003217986,0.00160993],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007832936,0.002651281,0.7916816,0.0008544487,0.0006954274,0.0004632543,0.03919991,0.006432198,0.02134946,0.0456797,0.0004014264,0.08275826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005116274,0.002069245,0.8441406,0.0001939629,0.0004877184,0.00030048,0.01845412,0.03744172,0.01120128,0.08326701,0.001737682,0.0001945791],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910199,0.00008056565,0.003261499,0.0001900737,0.000007065521,0.00005264019,0.00003601627,0.000009273397,0.005342932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990627,0.00002882186,0.0006390178,0.00004487548,0.000006245963,0.00005541298,0.00002524677,0.000004755051,0.0001330266],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02189631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1158002,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1580109398241092,"score_gpt":0.3737956880549793,"score_spread":0.21578474823087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}