{"id":"W2994828118","doi":"10.1080/24705357.2019.1680320","title":"A case-study evaluating river rehabilitation alternatives and habitat heterogeneity using the hydromorphological index of diversity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecohydraulics","topic":"Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Environmental science; Spatial heterogeneity; Diversity (politics); Diversity index; Index (typography); Channel (broadcasting); Spatial variability; Hydrology (agriculture); Restoration ecology; Ecology; Computer science; Geology; Species richness; Statistics; Biology; Geotechnical engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00245316,0.001140473,0.0008211749,0.001851292,0.0008336385,0.001391246,0.001408705,0.001894728,0.002881123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005528117,0.0004798273,0.001371753,0.001857099,0.001005258,0.0008997229,0.0008985693,0.0006788662,0.0002501739],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00288201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001086535,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01538771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02387145,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980598,0.0009803562,0.00008550251,0.0002362482,0.000288845,0.0003491513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955581,0.003033916,0.0003918433,0.0003083487,0.0004147177,0.0002931244],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002453801,0.006021207,0.1932893,0.0007124868,0.0004310588,0.009013052,0.0007285292,0.7303084,0.006237532,0.003259008,0.0011291,0.04641645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000647077,0.01091621,0.2023796,0.0001165994,0.0005529314,0.002377002,0.005206791,0.7612142,0.01047826,0.003091785,0.002771526,0.0002480056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949034,0.00008426524,0.002986603,0.00004885435,0.000005441022,0.0002164489,0.000300652,0.00001984231,0.001434417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99282,0.0000892546,0.00601252,0.00000868286,0.000005736574,0.0001314784,0.0002159666,0.00000927367,0.0007071308],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01538771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03059632,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05279768477958339,"score_gpt":0.3088543800139461,"score_spread":0.2560566952343627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}