{"id":"W2994873838","doi":"10.35219/ann-ugal-math-phys-mec.2018.2.09","title":"Various methods for calculating the water quality index","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of the ”Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati Fascicle II Mathematics Physics Theoretical Mechanics","topic":"Water Quality and Pollution Assessment","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Water quality; Quality (philosophy); Environmental science; Sanitation; Council of Ministers; Hydrology (agriculture); Water resource management; Computer science; Environmental engineering; Business; Engineering; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003020647,0.000169537,0.0003231922,0.0000162539,0.0006146097,0.00001689346,0.0008395285,0.0001136789,0.0003886559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000205067,0.00009771044,0.0003005382,0.0002016718,0.00102087,0.0001156246,0.000894988,0.0001644809,0.00001424146],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006030703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002625606,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001326237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001284528,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981842,0.0004589682,0.0003653314,0.000218648,0.0003933822,0.0003794872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983248,0.0004755618,0.0003218163,0.0006654078,0.0001183877,0.00009408769],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006672385,0.0003270642,0.0001007512,0.00007686771,0.0000841327,1.809587e-7,0.01472763,0.0005977697,0.02704339,0.9538445,0.0001693657,0.002961553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002314023,0.0001359084,0.0002024102,0.00003823138,0.00006384853,0.000001440346,0.0009830702,0.1050292,0.1261871,0.7665581,0.0004330417,0.0001362256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.262242,0.000001900687,0.7325506,0.003392175,0.00007880566,0.0003744646,0.00003107196,0.00002105709,0.001308029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588447,0.000002768165,0.04063027,0.0002890656,0.00003315149,0.000001134458,0.000002194993,0.00001499756,0.0001817449],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6966027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4727143,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05580155445467586,"score_gpt":0.3537587452757209,"score_spread":0.2979571908210451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}