{"id":"W2995019734","doi":"10.1136/bjsports-2019-101675","title":"Identifying the ‘incredible’! Part 2: Spot the difference - a rigorous risk of bias assessment can alter the main findings of a systematic review","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"British Journal of Sports Medicine","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Risk assessment; Medicine; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5347809,0.004598056,0.01349834,0.01254103,0.003817234,0.01926025,0.007608339,0.02478812,0.01837933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8473365,0.004519537,0.00896988,0.007962846,0.01424058,0.02027638,0.008504473,0.01479436,0.006435372],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008298345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02269948,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001487016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001783613,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2596602,0.4950561,0.1389183,0.01853787,0.08558893,0.002238724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.08860579,0.7268901,0.06783386,0.05063516,0.06325372,0.002781435],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003041586,0.0002948095,0.008105447,0.2072448,0.01224356,0.001457276,0.008861474,0.001624944,0.004902062,0.1020385,0.2673502,0.3828354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00236953,0.0008480439,0.007199273,0.2978569,0.007898516,0.0027807,0.002096182,0.01122638,0.005686749,0.340694,0.3202469,0.001096783],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.005600193,0.140669,0.2044735,0.4739872,0.1305842,0.02636529,0.003931778,0.002619181,0.01176971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1036895,0.03933638,0.547462,0.2111697,0.03943747,0.05089308,0.001368377,0.001363486,0.005280029],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4652191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.573698,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6291320683530806,"score_gpt":0.5086275613780205,"score_spread":0.1205045069750601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}