{"id":"W2995194683","doi":"10.1387/theoria.20040","title":"The philosopher’s paradox: How to make a coherent decision in the Newcomb Problem","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"THEORIA An International Journal for Theory History and Foundations of Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Argument (complex analysis); Constraint (computer-aided design); Swing; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Epistemology; Psychology; Economics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01878705,0.0001243136,0.0001850406,0.0005024924,0.000729977,0.0008945286,0.003532836,0.00003812745,0.0001542876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00266733,0.00006680802,0.0001099617,0.0003868541,0.00105619,0.001140593,0.0001648724,0.0001951947,0.00004285815],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003115606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003187033,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006437127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004463212,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971857,0.0002637367,0.000644427,0.0003808494,0.001303893,0.0002214151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994067,0.003880757,0.000462129,0.00056882,0.0009001157,0.0001212234],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004604234,0.00008539324,0.0004947247,5.542059e-7,0.000006266022,0.000001347347,0.002569368,0.0002569816,0.0004667488,0.6608976,0.000487165,0.3342734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003701387,0.0002332293,0.001996577,0.00003162325,0.000006536231,0.00006152477,0.003059415,0.0005013752,0.00001718776,0.8793803,0.1142501,0.00009196582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9781007,0.0001098073,0.009609994,0.002920298,0.005541789,0.0004601812,0.00001508656,0.000006779356,0.003235373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959955,0.00003149049,0.00246095,0.0003354503,0.0001600844,0.00002205866,0.000001277137,0.000007023608,0.0009861881],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3341814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.862596,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1115430744969728,"score_gpt":0.4157746412767543,"score_spread":0.3042315667797815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}