{"id":"W2995194683","doi":"10.1387/theoria.20040","title":"The philosopher’s paradox: How to make a coherent decision in the Newcomb Problem","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"THEORIA An International Journal for Theory History and Foundations of Science","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Argument (complex analysis); Constraint (computer-aided design); Swing; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Epistemology; Psychology; Economics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00910595,0.0004669912,0.00103519,0.0007960011,0.003088091,0.00521318,0.00163627,0.005681256,0.009682463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02609646,0.0004203191,0.001083185,0.000812158,0.0127389,0.01668846,0.005577778,0.007053612,0.000919516],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001749863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002036013,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002246383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001617864,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960753,0.001970263,0.0001962931,0.0007184512,0.0007029319,0.0003367236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900749,0.006411507,0.000768266,0.001427608,0.0006017085,0.0007160371],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002239408,0.00002167408,0.00013882,0.00002486078,0.00001100155,0.00008342402,0.0003092908,0.000810718,0.00008290556,0.9929381,0.002124051,0.003432772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002499237,0.000004592868,0.00006838875,0.00001114927,0.000002886702,0.00002476576,0.0001100831,0.001780867,0.00005350961,0.9952071,0.002705777,0.000005777957],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2094956,0.002908976,0.2906931,0.2032408,0.001237518,0.0002302545,0.0002643907,0.0002512102,0.2916783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9481818,0.0005395133,0.03682882,0.004343794,0.0002953863,0.0001408457,0.0000746217,0.00008730178,0.009508058],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009682463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04815745,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1115430744969728,"score_gpt":0.4157746412767543,"score_spread":0.3042315667797815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}