{"id":"W2995238860","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340044","title":"The Admissibility of Evidence Obtained through Human Rights Violations in Ghana: Analysing Cubagee v Asare and Others (NO. J6/04/2017) [2018] GHASC 14 (28 February 2018)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Appeal; Human rights; Jurisprudence; Political science; Constitution; Majority opinion; High Court","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02216386,0.0002656643,0.0005280914,0.005180317,0.006709245,0.007402201,0.001680659,0.006677782,0.006015718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07977758,0.0005948769,0.0006579101,0.005601738,0.01176424,0.004447176,0.003495038,0.006157767,0.0002303433],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01077199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008425605,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06159731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08712813,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9889585,0.005527744,0.0008752202,0.0006622102,0.002116135,0.001860113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8767466,0.1030862,0.0112269,0.001828378,0.005943667,0.001168291],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002892901,0.0001612913,0.09398245,0.001021354,0.0002450086,0.02024637,0.07016012,0.002019357,0.00110732,0.7577659,0.01971597,0.03328547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002848622,0.0004666154,0.1858436,0.01128344,0.001048349,0.00973685,0.1741079,0.005064514,0.003692619,0.3413563,0.2667615,0.0003533295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.760826,0.01458419,0.005049024,0.08397983,0.0002746704,0.0005881262,0.0007562665,0.00002068436,0.1339212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986832,0.002710707,0.00138665,0.005417969,0.00009942264,0.00008087414,0.00008299803,0.00001383385,0.00337556],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06159731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1224776,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1097220454704293,"score_gpt":0.3769219842927739,"score_spread":0.2671999388223446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}