{"id":"W2995238860","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340044","title":"The Admissibility of Evidence Obtained through Human Rights Violations in Ghana: Analysing Cubagee v Asare and Others (NO. J6/04/2017) [2018] GHASC 14 (28 February 2018)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Appeal; Human rights; Jurisprudence; Political science; Constitution; Majority opinion; High Court","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002387311,0.0001649629,0.0005165215,0.0001154562,0.001292474,0.0001145384,0.000360608,0.00005297421,0.000046142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000645273,0.00008690052,0.0001333067,0.0003749564,0.000756248,0.0007150081,0.00009011823,0.0002528809,0.000005424941],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002845246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002766683,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003586422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01972193,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976091,0.0004258481,0.0007725781,0.0002218396,0.0006439658,0.0003266008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975566,0.0009009807,0.0006654753,0.0002088894,0.0005580308,0.0001100416],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006526905,0.0005890649,0.3626778,0.0002144706,0.002987888,0.0001648541,0.5285976,0.0001357882,0.0007003593,0.07026153,0.02865284,0.004365125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002502913,0.001524577,0.5353517,0.00287878,0.0004614897,0.00001837368,0.2289542,0.00005932982,0.0002398265,0.1030297,0.1238565,0.001122658],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9820439,0.005330195,0.00004208704,0.002764575,0.0003793757,0.0002690101,0.000003090644,0.00001430935,0.009153472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973461,0.0004222729,0.0006262827,0.00003685863,0.0001529619,0.000002856138,2.146242e-7,0.000008158483,0.001404263],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2996434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981656,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1097220454704293,"score_gpt":0.3769219842927739,"score_spread":0.2671999388223446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}