{"id":"W2995238993","doi":"10.1093/jee/toz331","title":"Assessment of the Systems Approach for the Phytosanitary Treatment of Wood Infested With Wood-Boring Insects","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Entomology","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"FPInnovations; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Food Inspection Agency","keywords":"Emerald ash borer; Agrilus; Buprestidae; Fraxinus; Biology; Phytosanitary certification; PEST analysis; Integrated pest management; Pest control; Agroforestry; Agronomy; Toxicology; Horticulture; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000368007,0.0001042365,0.000315263,0.00004749056,0.00004721688,0.000005584758,0.0003111684,0.00005583777,0.000120075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005726641,0.00005385209,0.0001119794,0.00005621182,0.0001521265,0.0000930875,0.00007396146,0.00008051614,0.000004292243],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003923674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006649164,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002309423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000142883,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991541,0.00008014616,0.0004076763,0.0001193314,0.00007763712,0.0001611448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987971,0.0001922199,0.000714612,0.0002564717,0.0000119178,0.00002770507],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001981788,0.000466769,0.5888232,0.00007972535,0.000719917,0.000004128437,0.0005579492,0.4006575,0.002169964,0.005628938,0.0002302132,0.0004635371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003682596,0.004832576,0.9750168,0.00003755198,0.000288849,0.0002821249,0.0008423225,0.01136872,0.001566557,0.0003693011,0.001558138,0.0001545094],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943588,0.0001192753,0.0004706676,0.00006977339,0.0006114814,0.0006426576,0.000004400037,0.000002017462,0.003720915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989607,0.00004906886,0.0005966731,0.00003617357,0.00004412992,0.00003290777,9.925831e-7,0.00000820699,0.0002711361],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3892888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2196025,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01470706461746155,"score_gpt":0.2430298116378003,"score_spread":0.2283227470203388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}