{"id":"W2995315078","doi":"10.1080/09644016.2019.1703383","title":"Environmental provisions in trade agreements: defending regulatory space or pursuing offensive interests?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Politics","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Offensive; Sovereignty; International trade; Environmental regulation; Space (punctuation); Business; Bargaining power; Power (physics); Economics; International economics; Public economics; Political science; Law; Politics; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000205053,0.0002955689,0.0004499799,0.000262898,0.0001003768,0.00005593761,0.0002692471,0.0001583141,0.003317376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002414673,0.000349716,0.0001379429,0.00005985327,0.0001556423,0.0003051519,0.0002574976,0.0002714795,0.00309178],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001217455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009006088,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001238272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003567505,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978952,0.00002126536,0.0007138834,0.0005832025,0.00006238493,0.0007240202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989703,0.00008023191,0.0002851009,0.0004803843,4.004027e-7,0.0001835866],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007978365,0.000898829,0.9110159,0.0001104371,0.0001293817,0.00005083475,0.005793449,0.0003105684,0.00212613,0.07766245,0.001078216,0.0007440482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004511015,0.0005607677,0.8746961,0.0001919164,0.00003034823,0.00009699373,0.01480101,0.003747868,0.002533477,0.01676338,0.08018332,0.001883802],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897698,0.0004270145,0.00001681491,0.0005470215,0.0004732564,0.0004676312,0.0008457301,0.0000245711,0.00742821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953119,0.0004084674,0.0002352012,0.0008995804,0.0001532171,0.00002315284,0.0001063444,0.0000667014,0.002795486],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0791051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998955,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04165692577733911,"score_gpt":0.2240781066377081,"score_spread":0.182421180860369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}