{"id":"W2995493640","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2019-0239","title":"An approach to illustrate the naturalness of the Brazilian Araucaria forest","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalness; Araucaria; Forest management; Environmental science; Abundance (ecology); Forestry; Geography; Agroforestry; Ecology; Biology; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004854683,0.0003878836,0.0001620379,0.003492145,0.0005632497,0.001011547,0.0002712229,0.0002747238,0.001909168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00139369,0.00009777374,0.0003454763,0.00234838,0.0006619945,0.0004396972,0.00074098,0.0003840982,0.0000990095],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009238793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004719131,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02572368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04079437,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996678,0.0001651323,0.00001694113,0.00005770533,0.000055433,0.00003703161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996569,0.0001731051,0.00006316166,0.00002979613,0.00005519976,0.00002181244],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002970986,0.0002311943,0.3638373,0.0006843503,0.0001876771,0.002407689,0.02220281,0.03760651,0.06217507,0.2470592,0.005425759,0.2578855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005627334,0.0002551592,0.63021,0.0004225126,0.00008368838,0.002633828,0.01752458,0.1698045,0.009069109,0.05612966,0.1136771,0.0001336596],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8151657,0.001911384,0.1204174,0.0006110932,0.00005254087,0.0001914581,0.002592452,0.0002639434,0.05879397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9564862,0.0001832364,0.04208009,0.00002761969,0.0000056066,0.00008600895,0.0003014458,0.00001400154,0.000815785],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02572368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05114794,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03016556656214457,"score_gpt":0.2564045617720966,"score_spread":0.2262389952099521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}