{"id":"W2995868427","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106355","title":"Testing an ex-ante framework for the evaluation of impact assessment laws: Lessons from Canada and Brazil","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico","keywords":"Lawmaking; Legislature; Ex-ante; Scope (computer science); Parliament; Political science; Process (computing); Impact assessment; Public administration; Law; Environmental planning; Public economics; Law and economics; Economics; Computer science; Politics; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002096816,0.0006099604,0.0008295327,0.00002842857,0.0003471119,0.00009702943,0.0005926057,0.0001406008,0.009631032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001068309,0.0004192651,0.0003042429,0.0002373067,0.0002865603,0.0008100552,0.0004225181,0.0004382587,0.00004020804],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003580163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003586786,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.172871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01371769,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952062,0.0005662014,0.0008012373,0.0007667615,0.001963295,0.0006963341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969139,0.0009834495,0.0007328897,0.0009556987,0.000013492,0.0004006151],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001696229,0.0004339011,0.9106758,0.0001124588,0.0002990272,0.000002167349,0.000145745,0.001356334,0.01015104,0.000045672,0.0005356788,0.07622516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008531676,0.0005264416,0.98913,0.0005334009,0.0006834982,0.000008350433,0.0003661022,0.005482299,0.000158547,0.001274506,0.0004900287,0.000493669],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887202,0.004972724,0.0005717418,0.0005282541,0.0002423495,0.003336122,0.0005606476,0.00002150122,0.001046492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887848,0.003819283,0.005790689,0.000872988,0.00008150779,0.0002022695,0.0003197321,0.00006972457,0.00005900035],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1591533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998259,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05136555384875682,"score_gpt":0.4261873528508737,"score_spread":0.3748217990021169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}