{"id":"W2995901879","doi":"10.1080/00344893.2019.1704850","title":"Ideological Diversity, Intelligibility and Electoral Design: A Deliberative Perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Representation","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Deliberative democracy; Ideology; Sketch; Politics; Normative; Political science; Intelligibility (philosophy); Democracy; Epistemology; Diversity (politics); Positive economics; Sociology; Proportional representation; Law and economics; Political economy; Law; Economics; Computer science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03606426,0.0008093605,0.001160474,0.004481508,0.006078525,0.0146318,0.002318084,0.003722826,0.003936336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0281838,0.0006945792,0.001029438,0.002760034,0.05823985,0.01379054,0.00986276,0.004654069,0.0005096872],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004326703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002784306,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006032461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009743919,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9366623,0.05433377,0.001515216,0.001514471,0.00417579,0.001798414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9678383,0.02542689,0.0019608,0.002853722,0.001086858,0.0008333823],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002149078,0.00001590275,0.0003244301,0.00005950116,0.00001420688,0.00003076936,0.006098848,0.001088134,0.0001182618,0.9864159,0.0002003437,0.005612216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001824084,0.00003386083,0.0002434265,0.00009112647,0.000008309452,0.00004797582,0.003982145,0.00108055,0.0003017356,0.9825965,0.0115824,0.00001367791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1149006,0.005483971,0.4703635,0.04743009,0.0004143268,0.0002851004,0.00008803752,0.0001591403,0.3608753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9591024,0.0008675751,0.0347259,0.000663402,0.0001873649,0.0002391595,0.00003167764,0.00005291001,0.004129542],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03606426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1907282,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1360950482067668,"score_gpt":0.4265442062010856,"score_spread":0.2904491579943188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}