{"id":"W2995901879","doi":"10.1080/00344893.2019.1704850","title":"Ideological Diversity, Intelligibility and Electoral Design: A Deliberative Perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Representation","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Deliberative democracy; Ideology; Sketch; Politics; Normative; Political science; Intelligibility (philosophy); Democracy; Epistemology; Diversity (politics); Positive economics; Sociology; Proportional representation; Law and economics; Political economy; Law; Economics; Computer science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004005191,0.00005294168,0.00009971114,0.00002723532,0.0002756132,0.00004994381,0.00005362603,0.00006360623,0.0002134233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003769921,0.00004769306,0.00002708952,0.000157747,0.0001295675,0.0002468988,0.00006278364,0.0000703864,0.00007413382],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001649153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004131166,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03031735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002572048,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998791,0.0005107396,0.0001028031,0.0002108267,0.0002082597,0.0001763239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993256,0.0003086459,0.00004064244,0.00007297759,0.0001679028,0.00008419295],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000576772,0.00003535836,0.8022915,0.000004357384,0.00001385753,0.000001215418,0.01156887,0.00004653407,0.0006736328,0.1845275,0.0002018054,0.0005777199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005440957,0.0004329755,0.7496186,0.00001877314,0.0000353735,0.000001817052,0.00788958,0.001945047,0.002563679,0.2363045,0.0003502124,0.0002952689],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9874362,0.00004139577,0.003655544,0.001309926,0.00009535281,0.000457275,9.201486e-7,0.00004426339,0.00695913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988807,0.000003902798,0.0001819634,0.0000703508,0.00008343648,0.00000801191,0.000001722605,0.000002403921,0.0007675469],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05267282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9761398,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1360950482067668,"score_gpt":0.4265442062010856,"score_spread":0.2904491579943188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}