{"id":"W2995930886","doi":"10.1007/s10040-019-02073-1","title":"Water-table fluctuation method for assessing aquifer recharge: application to Canadian aquifers and comparison with other methods","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hydrogeology Journal","topic":"Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"","keywords":"Groundwater recharge; Aquifer; Hydrogeology; Water table; Groundwater; Hydrograph; Hydrology (agriculture); Depression-focused recharge; Scale (ratio); Geology; Environmental science; Table (database); Water resource management; Drainage basin; Computer science; Data mining; Geography; Geotechnical engineering; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001628238,0.000569591,0.0006024859,0.003196903,0.0009976955,0.0007065005,0.001261257,0.0003104989,0.001705855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002720579,0.0002486643,0.000438552,0.004525028,0.0003482912,0.0006418105,0.0005117686,0.0003794035,0.0002062305],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003594268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003840794,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7684212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8502916,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992536,0.00008965471,0.00004011522,0.0001329943,0.0004334127,0.00005019786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984736,0.0004467549,0.0001180907,0.0000850285,0.0008204043,0.00005609903],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008947516,0.0002760259,0.4249733,0.0005849455,0.000738966,0.0002761372,0.001046849,0.04939822,0.05124002,0.002729245,0.003818147,0.4640234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001126959,0.0002472504,0.563915,0.00004072288,0.0003324162,0.0003834397,0.0006319767,0.4033973,0.02275153,0.0009432258,0.006999482,0.0002450378],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6787723,0.001657389,0.298225,0.000199518,0.00008831876,0.0005207407,0.005853252,0.002450757,0.01223274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8433875,0.0009192161,0.1506161,0.00005640735,0.00001503606,0.0001542467,0.001091409,0.0001540588,0.003605924],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2315788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4658851,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01558160420968614,"score_gpt":0.2999021572216112,"score_spread":0.284320553011925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}