{"id":"W2995930886","doi":"10.1007/s10040-019-02073-1","title":"Water-table fluctuation method for assessing aquifer recharge: application to Canadian aquifers and comparison with other methods","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hydrogeology Journal","topic":"Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"","keywords":"Groundwater recharge; Aquifer; Hydrogeology; Water table; Groundwater; Hydrograph; Hydrology (agriculture); Depression-focused recharge; Scale (ratio); Geology; Environmental science; Table (database); Water resource management; Drainage basin; Computer science; Data mining; Geography; Geotechnical engineering; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001225112,0.0001229231,0.0002132069,0.0001175741,0.0002568879,0.0001264408,0.0001269711,0.0001071994,0.0009518621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001912129,0.00008307043,0.00002448575,0.00009146699,0.00002922949,0.0002338552,0.000006836336,0.0001857143,0.0000746329],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001929578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001083711,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01864566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0218674,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998893,0.0001429392,0.0002049724,0.0002453434,0.00009400512,0.0004197002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993502,0.000094362,0.0000693433,0.0001258778,0.00008121532,0.0002789524],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001184086,0.00001164286,0.8646179,0.0000334874,0.00007216955,0.000002612936,0.0009673802,0.007151433,0.03486561,0.00004886527,0.0004813648,0.0916291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002903334,0.0009865927,0.1118678,0.00008284309,0.0002207905,0.002360525,0.002105592,0.371944,0.1441696,0.009353129,0.3527775,0.001228334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6200602,0.0001010825,0.3763738,0.00113847,0.0001584657,0.0002774357,0.000008938552,0.00001188238,0.001869658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8044985,0.00000245838,0.194141,0.0008078233,0.0001000416,0.000005632375,0.0000719581,0.000006532181,0.000366131],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7527501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999614,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01558160420968614,"score_gpt":0.2999021572216112,"score_spread":0.284320553011925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}