{"id":"W2996165100","doi":"10.3390/g11010002","title":"A Condorcet Jury Theorem for Large Poisson Elections with Multiple Alternatives","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Condorcet method; Mathematical economics; Approval voting; Simple (philosophy); Voting; Population; Poisson distribution; Majority rule; State (computer science); Private information retrieval; Mathematics; Economics; Computer science; Statistics; Law; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03915234,0.001712245,0.004540448,0.002426733,0.005377807,0.005708719,0.005367757,0.005878285,0.02004991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.131231,0.00138174,0.005310827,0.002163848,0.009472366,0.01495966,0.006029623,0.01436064,0.002948787],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004864178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006780546,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002937305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001981603,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9786119,0.009012931,0.001057317,0.003649371,0.005199926,0.002468525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8978537,0.0802948,0.006286748,0.006902884,0.006334654,0.002327313],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002840804,0.00002106561,0.0002623352,0.00006549985,0.0000324768,0.00008777362,0.0001261857,0.005197297,0.0001977238,0.9884621,0.002417649,0.003101537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006669444,0.00002569591,0.0001584738,0.00003808464,0.00001851028,0.0001064159,0.00002033373,0.04241692,0.0002353892,0.9545024,0.002385879,0.00002520193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.02860786,0.0009287393,0.8901706,0.00914443,0.0004795716,0.0005521254,0.0006644608,0.0002178936,0.06923424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6859913,0.002124633,0.2631496,0.00629373,0.002579589,0.004026165,0.0008046867,0.0004518942,0.03457849],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03915234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2070599,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01788053986607944,"score_gpt":0.2257068361854498,"score_spread":0.2078262963193704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}