{"id":"W2996272675","doi":"10.1111/1911-3838.12211","title":"Paper and Hill: An In‐Class Corporate Governance Case","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting Perspectives","topic":"Accounting Education and Careers","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fiduciary; Corporate governance; Corporation; Duty; Class (philosophy); Business; Accounting; Duty of care; Loyalty; Corporate law; Public relations; Management; Economics; Finance; Marketing; Political science; Law; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006442209,0.000228264,0.0002280223,0.0001885789,0.0001611027,0.0005855426,0.000202292,0.00009177194,0.0006016035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002235183,0.0002262523,0.00004671763,0.0005259454,0.00009213684,0.003803624,0.0001285587,0.0002442322,0.0003190319],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009130843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000383896,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002536526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001087981,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998574,0.00001715606,0.0002535477,0.0005702074,0.0002371348,0.0003479923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989616,0.00005733883,0.000392667,0.0003342102,0.0002360295,0.00001809756],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004794509,0.0002102434,0.845318,0.0001618809,0.00002802487,0.0001630637,0.002945177,0.00006729745,0.001578036,0.1418686,0.002383377,0.005228316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001906811,0.00003080695,0.8231864,0.0001688085,0.00006037955,0.0002764319,0.1055161,0.007946731,0.00003496242,0.005894358,0.05369394,0.001284258],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9697742,0.0003493254,0.00000473262,0.001487557,0.0004901642,0.0002467994,0.00000217211,0.0001474267,0.02749767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960642,0.00002346512,0.00008689427,0.002525607,0.0007238769,0.00001587243,0.000008044178,0.00004483289,0.0005072338],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1359743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9226301,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01361411177085043,"score_gpt":0.2279626173952829,"score_spread":0.2143485056244325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}