{"id":"W2996436809","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0226727","title":"Acknowledgements are not just thank you notes: A qualitative analysis of acknowledgements content in scientific articles and reviews published in 2015","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Research Foundation; Leverhulme Trust; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; California Institute of Technology; National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Gratitude; Acknowledgement; Context (archaeology); Space (punctuation); Content analysis; Content (measure theory); Library science; Sociology; Linguistics; Computer science; Psychology; Social science; History; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04021269,0.0003399061,0.0006623464,0.006119146,0.003780018,0.004495332,0.0009701276,0.001150631,0.002252145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1055474,0.000475357,0.0003737824,0.006870191,0.005450939,0.00554687,0.005045465,0.001303574,0.000463866],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006869309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006203158,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003665831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007194053,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9616386,0.0274413,0.002704223,0.001652989,0.005363084,0.001199821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8220479,0.1433836,0.01386552,0.002297354,0.01673502,0.001670591],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009778653,0.00001782568,0.006212386,0.001390329,0.00001559289,0.0002947571,0.9717966,0.0000500603,0.002188506,0.003598797,0.001795955,0.01254145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007826518,0.00003626571,0.009246812,0.001052147,0.00001566341,0.0001599247,0.9669575,0.0001245713,0.0007565962,0.001126037,0.02048389,0.0000327663],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.971584,0.001755183,0.006785074,0.006542078,0.0001584553,0.0005422668,0.002074748,0.0000419119,0.01051631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862028,0.001451815,0.004678435,0.00118518,0.00005593752,0.001463158,0.000710861,0.00009265921,0.004159049],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9938809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2126676,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8034167113490062,"score_gpt":0.5691937306555053,"score_spread":0.2342229806935009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}