{"id":"W2996436809","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0226727","title":"Acknowledgements are not just thank you notes: A qualitative analysis of acknowledgements content in scientific articles and reviews published in 2015","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Research Foundation; Leverhulme Trust; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; California Institute of Technology; National Aeronautics and Space Administration","keywords":"Gratitude; Acknowledgement; Context (archaeology); Space (punctuation); Content analysis; Content (measure theory); Library science; Sociology; Linguistics; Computer science; Psychology; Social science; History; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04148742,0.0001923235,0.001188606,0.07042326,0.00007743265,0.001462656,0.00145257,0.00007998318,0.006335456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1413096,0.0001395969,0.0001636594,0.194297,0.0002683013,0.0009355769,0.0009076443,0.0002388773,0.002722536],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001822647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000990647,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006922964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001705479,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9898565,0.0009409863,0.001640701,0.001140116,0.005819502,0.0006022169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845116,0.003634883,0.0008013427,0.001222675,0.009505467,0.0003240526],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000587635,0.002696401,0.9758239,0.00009361642,0.0002437864,0.000002069672,0.005029556,0.000006505214,0.006179759,0.0000196638,0.004564105,0.005281816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001745227,0.0001616101,0.9693669,0.0003423454,0.0001757223,4.094008e-8,0.008854282,0.01141739,0.006080356,0.0006286568,0.0009513455,0.0002761106],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948089,0.002663158,0.00004318919,0.0004887048,0.0002905125,0.0009386145,0.00008314977,0.000006677339,0.0006771366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917684,0.0003815184,0.0006207249,0.00006211561,0.00001920441,0.00005011911,0.00001470647,0.000008678889,0.007074525],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1238738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995739,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8034167113490062,"score_gpt":0.5691937306555053,"score_spread":0.2342229806935009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}