{"id":"W2996456991","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030984","title":"Economic evaluation of clinical quality registries: a systematic review","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"BMJ Open","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Sanofi; AstraZeneca; Pfizer","keywords":"Medicine; Cost effectiveness; Grey literature; MEDLINE; Government (linguistics); Economic evaluation; Health care; Cost–benefit analysis; Population; Family medicine; Systematic review; Health economics; Public health; Nursing; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3945781,0.0006495123,0.02403163,0.0003588003,0.0001016995,0.0002072095,0.002789958,0.0007176531,0.001800971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06597416,0.0006774999,0.001883621,0.0002954116,0.0001210987,0.0007143581,0.0006581921,0.0004983285,0.02059378],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001764269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006134417,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001097119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001326351,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9331641,0.01511364,0.04886661,0.00181962,0.0004854437,0.0005505741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9346979,0.007175977,0.05295841,0.00458335,0.000325751,0.000258588],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005525102,0.00006214714,0.00005819909,0.935068,0.0006169281,2.500068e-7,0.00005402939,0.000003111155,1.050022e-10,0.02046725,0.03898575,0.004678829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000612882,0.00005228656,0.00002024516,0.521211,0.00143634,0.00001020771,0.00006738435,0.0001819812,2.650918e-9,0.001101467,0.4747178,0.0005883935],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000001933211,0.898123,0.00004758712,0.001552246,0.001583224,0.07724005,0.001403119,0.00002430382,0.0200245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000002106242,0.9802513,0.0004247195,0.002754387,0.0004348004,0.01267322,0.0004956641,0.0001042141,0.002859619],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4357321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995676,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.940070593896616,"score_gpt":0.7256888278831403,"score_spread":0.2143817660134757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}