{"id":"W2996665684","doi":"10.3905/jod.2019.1.092","title":"An Efficient Convergent Willow Tree Method for American and Exotic Option Pricing under Stochastic Volatility Models","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Derivatives","topic":"Stochastic processes and financial applications","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Stochastic volatility; Econometrics; Rate of convergence; Exotic option; Tree (set theory); Binomial options pricing model; Volatility (finance); Mathematics; Economics; Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Valuation of options; Key (lock)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001479548,0.0006011173,0.0007482561,0.001079464,0.0005831828,0.0009306746,0.001003936,0.001072212,0.003836547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003872151,0.0002580487,0.001066754,0.0009659096,0.0006365734,0.002104296,0.0009777895,0.001573987,0.0006842125],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005622644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00127324,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002160969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002215435,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995004,0.0002162908,0.00002795086,0.00004695951,0.0001639209,0.00004440063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990541,0.0004700417,0.00006910299,0.00007642266,0.0002507804,0.00007948201],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001267866,0.0001363816,0.002045792,0.0001600145,0.00008293378,0.0002285051,0.0002491517,0.3134912,0.008618364,0.4771452,0.003680599,0.194035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006931198,0.00002124357,0.00008635213,0.000007066609,0.000005596496,0.00002575984,0.00001092435,0.9753928,0.0003845368,0.02282454,0.001225323,0.000008880826],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007181393,0.0001399764,0.9913434,0.00006631594,0.0000436704,0.00002293366,0.00001668348,0.00007339813,0.001112279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2242917,0.0006850283,0.7677894,0.000153868,0.0001382893,0.0002037893,0.0001970459,0.000200338,0.006340626],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003836547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01283449,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04226431586588656,"score_gpt":0.2740048365115563,"score_spread":0.2317405206456697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}