{"id":"W2996711368","doi":"10.1080/10920277.2019.1658607","title":"An Efficient Method for Mitigating Longevity Value-at-Risk","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"North American Actuarial Journal","topic":"Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Society of Actuaries","keywords":"Longevity risk; Solvency; Hedge; Econometrics; Value at risk; Variance (accounting); Time horizon; Position (finance); Value (mathematics); Actuarial science; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Risk management; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004240876,0.0002721493,0.0005191755,0.0002274921,0.001781802,0.0003511859,0.0007415453,0.0000706221,0.0002239325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043896,0.0002552637,0.0004260384,0.0007337043,0.0004852154,0.000280142,0.0000825966,0.0005231648,0.00006377786],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000378657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000286964,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007200164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007214538,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954426,0.001355467,0.000592204,0.0005217038,0.001142655,0.0009453832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971471,0.0004905908,0.001119847,0.0004325291,0.0002858801,0.0005240407],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002579509,0.0002203525,0.8007425,0.0000154431,0.0001623214,0.00001152859,0.006360963,0.01277643,0.00007933809,0.001319053,0.0005941751,0.1774599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00182364,0.0008641422,0.9395796,0.00002665228,0.0002943579,0.00001373174,0.006006979,0.01064524,0.00006816568,0.000606501,0.03929967,0.0007713414],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.958271,0.00003293749,0.0342918,0.0003172221,0.002163514,0.0009585022,0.00005994445,0.00009746806,0.003807585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9522924,0.0001015676,0.04498494,0.0004980377,0.001943641,0.00002375908,0.00001164736,0.00003825963,0.000105713],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1766886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01113521590714135,"score_gpt":0.3283145634406089,"score_spread":0.3171793475334676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}