{"id":"W2996711368","doi":"10.1080/10920277.2019.1658607","title":"An Efficient Method for Mitigating Longevity Value-at-Risk","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"North American Actuarial Journal","topic":"Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Society of Actuaries","keywords":"Longevity risk; Solvency; Hedge; Econometrics; Value at risk; Variance (accounting); Time horizon; Position (finance); Value (mathematics); Actuarial science; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Risk management; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001897489,0.0005052027,0.0007479014,0.001009299,0.0003988709,0.0007799991,0.0008224886,0.0008973958,0.00297818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005424534,0.0003482374,0.0005401194,0.0006403231,0.0004825065,0.0009521128,0.001012855,0.0009757975,0.0003338709],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005554903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001525822,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00204242,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994606,0.0001554542,0.00003106142,0.00007561942,0.0002350981,0.00004210894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987215,0.000745891,0.0001341449,0.0001157157,0.0002395123,0.00004315492],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001236114,0.0001080977,0.001804879,0.0001773311,0.00007688902,0.0001599708,0.0001454625,0.5209315,0.01435632,0.08697226,0.003666099,0.3714775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001224602,0.00005122624,0.0002706356,0.00001530796,0.00001057424,0.00007845688,0.00001256791,0.9825068,0.00182122,0.01349493,0.001713423,0.00001263077],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.004208399,0.00008853426,0.9946983,0.00006477731,0.0000217729,0.00003467557,0.00001729037,0.00009744389,0.0007687539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1931934,0.0002631076,0.8017333,0.00008073649,0.00008957825,0.0001992354,0.0001180699,0.00007076147,0.004251882],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00297818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01003498,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01113521590714135,"score_gpt":0.3283145634406089,"score_spread":0.3171793475334676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}