{"id":"W2997021363","doi":"10.1017/cls.2019.36","title":"Access to Information, Higher Education, and Reputational Risk: Insights from a Case Study","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Higher education; Public relations; Information assurance; Discipline; Imprisonment; Work (physics); Value (mathematics); Political science; Quality (philosophy); League table; Information security; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Computer security; Economics; Law; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01822992,0.0003947449,0.0006384608,0.003637841,0.02072573,0.00881417,0.002104183,0.003812982,0.004870143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03626866,0.0004595792,0.0004699359,0.004626948,0.01098756,0.007387414,0.008000549,0.004227531,0.0004130731],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009338374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005617903,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02989885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05279347,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9784637,0.01648672,0.000682514,0.0004787134,0.002045886,0.001842472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9335933,0.05369098,0.005073884,0.001979195,0.00247002,0.003192595],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005037692,0.0008547039,0.03599955,0.0001493052,0.00001308976,0.009708142,0.9133391,0.000197671,0.0002226869,0.02542949,0.002192181,0.01184368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001011407,0.0001169695,0.007245894,0.000160275,0.000009001382,0.001637225,0.9797284,0.0003879317,0.0001774133,0.002062151,0.008441578,0.00002298768],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9787263,0.0003216175,0.001016088,0.004684303,0.00002753795,0.0001058092,0.00005217871,0.000006205124,0.0150599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968065,0.0004229134,0.0006965718,0.0003152119,0.00002096037,0.0000668354,0.00001562875,0.000005674983,0.001649726],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02989885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09641016,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02800139465247765,"score_gpt":0.3358147780282687,"score_spread":0.3078133833757911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}