{"id":"W2997326147","doi":"10.1080/17421772.2019.1701700","title":"Knock on wood: managing forests for carbon in the presence of natural disturbance risk","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Spatial Economic Analysis","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; U.S. Forest Service","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Disturbance (geology); Carbon fibers; Natural resource economics; Environmental science; Carbon accounting; Natural (archaeology); Ecosystem; Forest management; Agroforestry; Greenhouse gas; Ecology; Economics; Geography; Carbon dioxide; Computer science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000265009,0.00009691277,0.0001915565,0.00010262,0.00003379763,0.00001797155,0.0003642233,0.0000239719,0.0004225854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001705898,0.00007281719,0.0001493561,0.0002140617,0.00005991921,0.00008053888,0.00007787429,0.00007371849,0.0001623029],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009586976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003648981,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03056506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035051,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992398,0.00004175901,0.0001988185,0.0002484221,0.00008753931,0.0001836404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993477,0.000127655,0.0001605311,0.0003448802,0.000001556057,0.000017667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004322976,0.00001688833,0.7959665,0.000007309139,0.00009599833,2.617917e-7,0.0003056767,0.1988694,0.00000545096,0.0006671686,0.0003404155,0.003681719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002343847,0.00004836791,0.5092313,0.000003983808,0.0001379655,3.933828e-8,0.0000266743,0.4882315,0.00002599883,0.0009953275,0.0009676777,0.00009679796],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839585,0.00001788028,0.00009192689,0.0002075668,0.00009150323,0.0003154588,0.00001239621,0.000005241202,0.0152995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981023,0.0000140262,0.00003455313,0.00005522169,0.00003842743,0.00002361897,0.00001304742,0.000005751113,0.001713053],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2893621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9825568,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004280147334338565,"score_gpt":0.213649228073087,"score_spread":0.2093690807387484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}