{"id":"W2999235517","doi":"10.1061/9780784482506.055","title":"Rigid versus Flexible Pipe Material Surge Response: A Case Study for a Raw Water Pipeline","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pipelines 2019","topic":"Water Systems and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"HydraTek (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Water hammer; Surge; Pipeline (software); Water pipe; Pipeline transport; Transient (computer programming); Canalisation; Pipe; Nominal Pipe Size; Structural engineering; Head (geology); Materials science; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Piping; Computer science; Composite material; Geology; Electrical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006099705,0.0006759237,0.0004298823,0.0005695935,0.0006795216,0.0005876973,0.000774785,0.001421975,0.00255151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001955354,0.0004355922,0.0006902142,0.0005576453,0.0006161465,0.000614236,0.0004491842,0.0006904112,0.0002414671],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007582501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005322846,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005866937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009891154,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995907,0.0001436551,0.00002078292,0.00004050792,0.0001365379,0.00006784861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981222,0.00139614,0.0001236866,0.00007882395,0.0001905422,0.00008865348],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008115066,0.00115629,0.01543035,0.0005926182,0.00006466529,0.007011804,0.0009863962,0.9155067,0.03514293,0.002698053,0.001787417,0.0188114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002842717,0.006120516,0.01697577,0.00003783896,0.00008024193,0.0009550023,0.002269675,0.9325805,0.03618616,0.001510387,0.002902113,0.00009758437],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907795,0.00003613958,0.005463248,0.0001168679,0.000007444932,0.0001043446,0.000192729,0.00009240903,0.003207432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948979,0.00004207651,0.003561483,0.00001110591,0.000003704479,0.00003176526,0.00005418086,0.00001325856,0.001384588],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005866937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01166558,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01718675867834463,"score_gpt":0.2514977694071694,"score_spread":0.2343110107288248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}