{"id":"W2999284478","doi":"10.1109/tse.2020.2966994","title":"<i>checsdm</i>: A Method for Ensuring Consistency in Heterogeneous Safety-Critical System Design","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering","topic":"Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Consistency (knowledge bases); Set (abstract data type); Engineering design process; Component (thermodynamics); Software engineering; Programming language; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02525511,0.002048417,0.001895769,0.004196658,0.002806406,0.006094115,0.005753895,0.003306881,0.005485103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0617539,0.002470412,0.004054704,0.003333162,0.004323735,0.006003311,0.00924519,0.005538142,0.002251604],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003235523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01045647,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004880357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005967647,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9710179,0.01202896,0.002981534,0.003330106,0.009713545,0.0009280546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9636341,0.01509869,0.002091807,0.01171555,0.006810931,0.0006488993],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003508084,0.0003948635,0.002985108,0.00157452,0.000417956,0.0009222064,0.002968945,0.08626471,0.01941247,0.3865637,0.02535895,0.4727857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003525317,0.0003201363,0.0007620213,0.0008896272,0.0003414021,0.0009690762,0.0006460712,0.5736812,0.06316043,0.1968185,0.161812,0.0002470326],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004435007,0.00002729313,0.9975114,0.0001047646,0.00002473784,0.0001978139,0.0000549147,0.0008981223,0.0007373854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01031469,0.00006266907,0.9873487,0.0001333889,0.00002236733,0.0004734543,0.0003142914,0.0004251328,0.0009053418],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02525511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1335634,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02858974122118303,"score_gpt":0.2568440467938464,"score_spread":0.2282543055726634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}