{"id":"W2999490310","doi":"10.31221/osf.io/j9hkn","title":"The Valuation of Credit Default Swap with Counterparty Risk and Collateralization","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Credit Risk and Financial Regulations","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Collateralization; Credit default swap; Collateralized debt obligation; Credit risk; Credit valuation adjustment; Credit derivative; Business; iTraxx; Valuation (finance); Credit default swap index; Counterparty; Default risk; Swap (finance); Synthetic CDO; Collateral; Actuarial science; Financial economics; Economics; Finance; Credit reference","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005972433,0.0001534646,0.000343689,0.0001100405,0.000162036,0.0001214557,0.0001473191,0.0001850687,0.00004632916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001226246,0.0001177318,0.00006381816,0.0001239713,0.0001011474,0.00009255225,0.0001280026,0.0001724271,0.00003394017],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006008241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006892259,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001375387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004510604,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988746,0.00001941357,0.0005644618,0.0003370059,0.00006580964,0.0001387337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984269,0.0001149415,0.00084941,0.0004328695,0.000145146,0.00003075957],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008320728,0.00004227605,0.7164491,0.00009018223,0.0001109691,2.320526e-7,0.000855396,0.02647689,0.00000203469,0.2510586,0.002405687,0.002425419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005319789,0.0001038799,0.7611431,0.00005874251,0.00004378617,0.00000127122,0.00007701052,0.1107919,0.00002019533,0.09773896,0.02921624,0.0002729695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7950336,0.002267389,0.1846132,0.0003381451,0.001218893,0.0009654648,0.0007878963,0.00003478345,0.01474067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948829,0.002002167,0.0006488823,0.00000855971,0.0001259102,0.00003785923,0.0001215596,0.00001997454,0.002152191],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1998493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4800963,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02806837117586765,"score_gpt":0.2247836544845924,"score_spread":0.1967152833087248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}