{"id":"W2999647517","doi":"","title":"Shale gas environmental impacts: Lessons learned from U.S. practices and recommendations for measuring, monitoring, mitigating and managing impacts in Europe","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences)","topic":"Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental planning; Shale gas; Environmental resource management; Natural resource economics; Environmental protection; Business; Oil shale; Engineering; Waste management; Political science; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002515759,0.0002172018,0.0001702555,0.00008584711,0.001047955,0.0004176169,0.0005043317,0.00006712704,0.0003705027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001680204,0.0002143001,0.00002978056,0.0005889648,0.001056378,0.002226811,0.0008300231,0.0002674555,0.00004057339],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003719228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004705393,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003405274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000905028,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968632,0.0001986616,0.0003761916,0.0009861503,0.0006699575,0.0009057648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981528,0.0005323762,0.0003439468,0.0004732349,0.00004273094,0.000454942],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001717967,0.0006235911,0.7510355,0.00009146795,0.00003840901,0.000005185349,0.004943535,0.00007665233,0.0250088,0.0005428356,0.009644908,0.2078173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002421968,0.0004057691,0.6076739,0.0002210763,0.00005076995,0.00001800099,0.008778461,0.1202799,0.003124768,0.002574871,0.2535358,0.0009147134],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9751546,0.0001605561,0.001727473,0.02064978,0.0001134269,0.0008826945,0.0008712425,0.00004122594,0.0003990202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9488883,0.002287646,0.04608248,0.0002273889,0.0002106222,0.0002176345,0.00111703,0.00004840132,0.0009204973],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2438909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8738903,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08792184789875475,"score_gpt":0.3663695712806163,"score_spread":0.2784477233818616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}