{"id":"W2999917256","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1909726116","title":"Effective fisheries management instrumental in improving fish stock status","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":819,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Environmental Defense Fund; Nature Conservancy; Walton Family Foundation; Wildlife Conservation Society","keywords":"Overfishing; Fish stock; Fishery; Fisheries management; Stock assessment; Abundance (ecology); Stock (firearms); Fisheries science; Marine fish; Marine fisheries; Fishing; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Business; Geography; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004792841,0.00007276546,0.0001012493,0.00004806306,0.0001066001,0.00002735193,0.0005996914,0.00003475995,0.000347581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001839604,0.00005247141,0.00003643193,0.0008489394,0.0007696886,0.0005802996,0.0007873495,0.0001551777,0.000002526939],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009259767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006170882,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000892352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001240598,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983139,0.0000069127,0.0002007279,0.0002406429,0.0010386,0.0001992326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997538,0.00003894376,0.0001363757,0.000005426495,0.00001630203,0.00004912027],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005614065,0.00005212903,0.9275735,0.0001166707,0.000009853835,3.890714e-8,0.0007254436,0.00005763608,0.02805453,0.002137162,0.001790049,0.03942683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003341143,0.0001399843,0.957505,0.00001774921,0.000004039752,0.000001191784,0.0008200029,0.003211414,0.03072332,0.003423425,0.003714629,0.0001051574],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8308263,0.000002598159,4.547321e-7,0.003291511,0.000006247636,0.000321296,0.000007029018,0.000006081836,0.1655384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998492,0.00001389758,0.0007456231,0.0005584332,0.00001716217,0.00002565518,1.044283e-7,0.000002761866,0.0001443566],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1676657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3805768,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02583525460745102,"score_gpt":0.269398905607569,"score_spread":0.243563651000118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}