{"id":"W2999917256","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1909726116","title":"Effective fisheries management instrumental in improving fish stock status","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":819,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Environmental Defense Fund; Nature Conservancy; Walton Family Foundation; Wildlife Conservation Society","keywords":"Overfishing; Fish stock; Fishery; Fisheries management; Stock assessment; Abundance (ecology); Stock (firearms); Fisheries science; Marine fish; Marine fisheries; Fishing; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Business; Geography; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002375493,0.0003549671,0.0002039113,0.001594985,0.0008930895,0.001423129,0.0007263487,0.0004667573,0.004475458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003338892,0.0001272261,0.0002584343,0.001638248,0.0004179908,0.0009622483,0.0009952153,0.0003613123,0.0010668],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001256973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003071638,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008977612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02855753,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990197,0.0002758126,0.0001404116,0.0001497676,0.0002600186,0.0001543032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984862,0.0001573514,0.0004542388,0.0001695913,0.0005672459,0.0001653788],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008676802,0.0003487922,0.2668733,0.0005282828,0.0001304067,0.0002481872,0.0006149921,0.002836867,0.01269566,0.007239101,0.01981739,0.6885802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004390375,0.0005403156,0.7727382,0.001259333,0.0003224985,0.0004686152,0.004688983,0.004951076,0.01138473,0.009977759,0.1935402,0.00008433665],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6977796,0.01386676,0.05053182,0.02495374,0.001155184,0.001402517,0.005794444,0.0009482396,0.2035678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9131629,0.006767983,0.04929651,0.002079835,0.0002923872,0.0003400193,0.001475634,0.00005548562,0.02652921],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008977612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01785076,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02583525460745102,"score_gpt":0.269398905607569,"score_spread":0.243563651000118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}