{"id":"W3000472856","doi":"10.5558/tfc2019-025","title":"Assessing tree-related microhabitat retention according to a harvest gradient using tree-defect surveys as proxies in Eastern Canadian mixedwood forests","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs","keywords":"Basal area; Biodiversity; Abundance (ecology); Environmental science; Forestry; Clearcutting; Agroforestry; Bark (sound); Logging; Forest management; Geography; Ecology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007701898,0.0002008636,0.0002354437,0.00005354463,0.0005588213,0.0001641991,0.0003658616,0.0001484567,0.0000867783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006482514,0.00008721439,0.0001396803,0.0005324217,0.0001233408,0.0003877471,0.0001787452,0.0002180322,0.0003319234],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003448374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006886886,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1079279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8049636,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982997,0.0002809917,0.0002390426,0.0003782722,0.0001513524,0.0006506137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994581,0.0001483886,0.0000995087,0.000110608,0.00004240442,0.0001410092],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002534045,0.00004005978,0.988801,0.00001047251,0.00003403207,0.00001641737,0.0002215673,0.0001524347,0.006301109,0.00007330713,0.00006364771,0.00426058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003317635,0.0003686613,0.9951721,0.00008850241,0.00002344852,0.00001878687,0.00203877,0.0007550872,0.000405415,0.0003355595,0.0002467749,0.0002151084],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967657,0.0001705017,7.626409e-7,0.001321687,0.0002563405,0.0005994773,0.00001909088,0.00004208427,0.0008243593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993649,0.000005517504,0.00002077763,0.0001131266,0.00004728273,0.00001055302,0.00003952938,0.000002439459,0.0003959469],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6970357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8980125,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03221658293300791,"score_gpt":0.241525731374193,"score_spread":0.2093091484411851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}