{"id":"W3000603011","doi":"10.24124/2011/bpgub1505","title":"Wind energy on the horizon in British Columbia : a review and evaluation of the British Columbia wind energy planning framework","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"","topic":"Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"David Suzuki Foundation","keywords":"Wind power; Scope (computer science); Strategic environmental assessment; Government (linguistics); Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Geography; Resource (disambiguation); Typology; Inclusion (mineral); Environmental impact assessment; Political science; Engineering; Environmental science; Sociology; Archaeology; Computer science; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004166492,0.0006625837,0.001340575,0.007784914,0.001065002,0.00262241,0.001141181,0.0007996279,0.001555946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006334274,0.0004315463,0.0005931632,0.0172224,0.0008457647,0.001094012,0.0008321159,0.001044439,0.0001987004],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01583943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0604938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6347167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8613192,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984505,0.000336089,0.0002200844,0.00008968968,0.0007877671,0.000115805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99529,0.001640613,0.0005065704,0.00008125341,0.002258482,0.0002230059],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009697812,0.00004366118,0.00155709,0.07426024,0.0002898249,0.0002660158,0.001027899,0.001280139,0.0004764785,0.004866653,0.02991547,0.8859196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039312,0.000132425,0.02563942,0.1428428,0.001435499,0.0004658478,0.00219381,0.0004212724,0.0004406787,0.001182118,0.8251006,0.000106194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009455452,0.9960598,0.00005343897,0.0007098951,0.00008195168,0.00001896627,0.00007329872,0.000003971768,0.002053172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009468384,0.989383,0.0003035447,0.0002586569,0.00002186629,0.00002575223,0.0000876588,0.000002446111,0.0004486368],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3652833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7348691,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05704190270018309,"score_gpt":0.3297169504381263,"score_spread":0.2726750477379432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}