{"id":"W3001295232","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.2018-0036","title":"Validating the Police Legitimacy Scale with a Canadian Sample","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Operationalization; Scale (ratio); Confirmatory factor analysis; Procedural justice; Law enforcement; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Criminology; Psychology; Political science; Perception; Law; Structural equation modeling; Politics; Statistics; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00265408,0.000327245,0.0004808174,0.0006603784,0.001753562,0.0003567415,0.0009570328,0.0004314932,0.0005256436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002688064,0.0002846016,0.0001233236,0.000231445,0.001312901,0.0005640997,0.00003856497,0.001404709,0.00003157211],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001451283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01351086,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9668725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9939697,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958736,0.0009312665,0.0004972306,0.000373735,0.0001618009,0.002162328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930847,0.002937153,0.0004352638,0.0004170041,0.0005587048,0.002567167],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002311347,0.00007270461,0.02970294,0.001236176,0.0002896243,0.001106516,0.7238586,0.001470824,0.0003611527,0.224624,0.003028005,0.01401838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007966773,0.0007134328,0.0653152,0.0004060866,0.00778408,0.005882479,0.8388253,0.0002282614,0.00004299745,0.002144753,0.07716025,0.0007004447],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9560352,0.0002708078,0.0004064368,0.01329815,0.0004983193,0.0002727307,0.00007127396,0.00002324121,0.02912382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887821,0.0004849311,0.003230088,0.006060595,0.0006634034,0.00001500739,0.000008635534,0.00004052487,0.0007147204],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2224792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999606,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1199627929266677,"score_gpt":0.3522268514741859,"score_spread":0.2322640585475182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}