{"id":"W3001831322","doi":"10.1080/01615440.2019.1684859","title":"Computational genealogy: Continuities and discontinuities in the political rhetoric of US presidents","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Historical Methods A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History","topic":"Computational and Text Analysis Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Classification of discontinuities; Discontinuity (linguistics); Dissent; Politics; Epistemology; Contingency; Field (mathematics); Temporalities; History; Sociology; Genealogy; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Law; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003355802,0.0001451352,0.0002782136,0.002170269,0.001137343,0.002940199,0.000835228,0.0005703807,0.002555432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03593152,0.0002342555,0.0003738159,0.002079378,0.002423291,0.005101943,0.001731492,0.000968809,0.0002010605],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001032609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007589188,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003884654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005997697,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986462,0.0008100624,0.00006456185,0.00026979,0.0001571759,0.00005224062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9758649,0.02071394,0.001311442,0.001462789,0.0004489851,0.0001978537],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005781041,0.0003615751,0.2098483,0.0004373483,0.0002227978,0.0005795172,0.04064314,0.09077884,0.00302215,0.3928668,0.006777016,0.2538844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004395368,0.0000892661,0.05249889,0.0001517815,0.00007166176,0.0003946159,0.01082018,0.615862,0.002347196,0.3044471,0.01320926,0.00006415692],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9374766,0.0004193454,0.05300801,0.001813304,0.00002794439,0.00004349711,0.0006888573,0.0001934541,0.006328908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809731,0.00007827251,0.01796381,0.0000513613,0.00001403223,0.00003970825,0.0003871555,0.00002336082,0.0004691342],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003884654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0177474,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0709380121781449,"score_gpt":0.4277121197626408,"score_spread":0.3567741075844959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}