{"id":"W3002893443","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2019-0276","title":"Comparing performance of catch-based and length-based stock assessment methods in data-limited fisheries","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Seafood Sustainability Foundation; Walton Family Foundation","keywords":"Stock assessment; Stock (firearms); Maximum sustainable yield; Fishery; Econometrics; Fisheries management; Statistics; Environmental science; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Fishing; Geography; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02702195,0.001158589,0.001076721,0.002858738,0.0005200161,0.001522778,0.001358963,0.001435486,0.0009289418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05579605,0.000585577,0.001643766,0.001379736,0.0006200691,0.003301751,0.00205733,0.0007196889,0.0002998455],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00144135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001543942,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01598577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01967699,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9903648,0.005975289,0.0008563166,0.001227208,0.001379403,0.0001969759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9434494,0.04707016,0.002831414,0.002610312,0.003573418,0.0004652366],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003611113,0.0008221386,0.3265199,0.001184528,0.005297422,0.0001184914,0.0005199179,0.4524105,0.004134217,0.003644325,0.000965221,0.2007722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002428578,0.00213026,0.1143923,0.0003063617,0.0008723339,0.0001586904,0.0004704773,0.8678206,0.005683422,0.006184108,0.001475709,0.0002628924],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8195676,0.003129705,0.1709963,0.0004065254,0.0001002138,0.0003751439,0.001785111,0.0005773134,0.003062014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9216363,0.0007196438,0.07471824,0.0001103796,0.00002708388,0.0002457396,0.001807278,0.00007780964,0.0006574559],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9729781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1429074,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1155866161152609,"score_gpt":0.330543557319998,"score_spread":0.2149569412047371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}