{"id":"W3003130759","doi":"10.24908/pceea.vi0.13779","title":"BUILDING EFFECTIVE CASE STUDIES FOR MATERIALS","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","topic":"Problem and Project Based Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Curiosity; Class (philosophy); Subject (documents); Mathematics education; Characterization (materials science); Computer science; Process (computing); Graph; Pedagogy; Psychology; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence; Nanotechnology; Materials science; Theoretical computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03889957,0.001943993,0.0009682033,0.007482528,0.004641835,0.01144842,0.006064913,0.004612643,0.02026204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05478191,0.001168854,0.001628919,0.003507883,0.004019339,0.01373424,0.009141121,0.003719874,0.003873309],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00591395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006299978,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001037541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002483889,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9455366,0.04127971,0.002489476,0.00254638,0.006573127,0.001574758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9349045,0.04703536,0.002436907,0.008220861,0.005668313,0.00173404],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003087193,0.003513254,0.005109294,0.003358638,0.0001430577,0.005723942,0.04978216,0.02318764,0.007611758,0.5103923,0.03570675,0.3551625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004051575,0.001064846,0.001373376,0.004860095,0.0001461682,0.00185434,0.04058848,0.0299806,0.01528198,0.2193292,0.6849383,0.0001774699],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.05668686,0.002635649,0.7625008,0.009544684,0.0007305057,0.02283622,0.001446452,0.00112621,0.1424927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1118043,0.001061217,0.868446,0.0005959984,0.00005871733,0.008446262,0.0007140627,0.000149196,0.008724242],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03889957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.205723,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008649300745116167,"score_gpt":0.2867924747284564,"score_spread":0.2781431739833403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}