{"id":"W3003311416","doi":"10.1017/s001221731900012x","title":"Complex Justice for Complex Problems: Comments on Johannsen’s<i>A Conceptual Investigation of Justice</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Deliberation; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Social justice; Law; Law and economics; Criminology; Political science; Computer science; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006968554,0.0001269115,0.0002584509,0.00004625235,0.0003583892,0.00002875635,0.0002759524,0.0001733071,0.0001033856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007528649,0.0001280707,0.0000808248,0.0001534511,0.001047622,0.0001330647,0.00003689598,0.0001823161,0.0001401607],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007996662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001616584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005774477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000214355,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983962,0.0002780298,0.0003098799,0.0002262508,0.0003939299,0.0003957032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976802,0.001567163,0.000150577,0.0001880203,0.0002220123,0.0001919731],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004706546,0.0000730661,0.0004201301,0.0002513024,0.00001868399,2.882466e-7,0.01342949,0.00009634477,0.001327053,0.9746032,0.009647888,0.00008547235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003703926,0.001211323,0.009293327,0.0003158912,0.0005150802,6.609987e-7,0.01351081,0.001652993,0.001085716,0.7310509,0.2368641,0.0007952552],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4770974,0.0001025628,0.002576385,0.06002653,0.005075994,0.005853097,0.002409405,0.000380386,0.4464782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893044,0.00001329964,0.0005699762,0.00908543,0.0005303841,0.0000306009,0.0002828368,0.00001351705,0.0001696188],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5122069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5222573,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.206923726229794,"score_gpt":0.3669070476096311,"score_spread":0.1599833213798371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}