{"id":"W3003395634","doi":"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105107","title":"Risk assessment of rainstorm disasters under different return periods: A case study of Bohai Rim, China","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ocean & Coastal Management","topic":"Flood Risk Assessment and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"China; Geography; Vulnerability (computing); Emergency management; Hazard; Population; Risk assessment; Disaster risk reduction; Precipitation; Environmental science; Environmental planning; Meteorology; Environmental health; Economic growth","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003154808,0.0004074606,0.0005088813,0.00009404463,0.0001925188,0.00005587326,0.0004938268,0.00004122663,0.000633123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007237346,0.0003344379,0.0001811209,0.0004477468,0.0001839947,0.0002471197,0.002006723,0.0002197999,0.00001498552],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001712739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007804653,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001487343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001430016,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970431,0.0001960671,0.000690643,0.0006952345,0.0009626187,0.0004123638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986418,0.0000298692,0.0004659946,0.0006250649,0.00001278446,0.0002244636],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002032202,0.006578959,0.9264169,0.000523434,0.001165995,0.001487542,0.01709246,0.02467696,0.0003177017,0.0009821509,0.006417037,0.0141376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005163363,0.003419339,0.8539992,0.00004951024,0.0008242903,0.0000159262,0.1190664,0.0151356,0.00005851024,0.0002198109,0.001319174,0.0007288726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9746131,0.00001186198,0.004672767,0.0003277813,0.0001723731,0.00165425,0.00003233276,0.00006450081,0.01845108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980067,0.0000579462,0.001199386,0.0001362904,0.00003134221,0.0000311429,0.00001534043,0.00004009359,0.0004817798],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.101974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999108,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01093826980153004,"score_gpt":0.2490983502606878,"score_spread":0.2381600804591578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}