{"id":"W3003409247","doi":"10.1177/0021998320902243","title":"Experimental investigation of failure mechanisms and evaluation of physical/mechanical properties of unidirectional flax–epoxy composites","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Composite Materials","topic":"Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Materials science; Composite material; Epoxy; Finite element method; Composite number; Fiber; Fiber-reinforced composite; Tension (geology); Fibre-reinforced plastic; Shear (geology); Material Design; Composite epoxy material; Compression (physics); Structural engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004196621,0.0007134444,0.0002254153,0.0004414919,0.0003749602,0.0001020363,0.000310961,0.0004710569,0.002034996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003991163,0.0002065526,0.000196466,0.0002742114,0.0003490321,0.0002871983,0.0002533396,0.0003557127,0.0002666677],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001083008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001031578,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003459962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006135546,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996814,0.00003407653,0.00002605164,0.00007236437,0.0001280866,0.00005800091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993637,0.000155368,0.0001337648,0.0001281578,0.000173987,0.00004501873],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007740118,0.00007349066,0.0009086226,0.0000584369,0.000003405648,0.00006468091,0.0001051799,0.0004397836,0.9967613,0.00005566243,0.00001895834,0.001433078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006186207,0.001041722,0.01120104,0.000009725041,0.00001174546,0.00009788552,0.00007540174,0.001682416,0.9854071,0.00004016325,0.000416608,0.000009977612],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968749,0.0001531416,0.002175435,0.000005373606,0.000005290432,0.00002277494,0.0001218346,0.00003114244,0.0006100361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995924,0.0001811018,0.002799948,0.000005667304,0.000004197088,0.0000519153,0.0001156167,0.00001636869,0.0009011923],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002034996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006807745,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03433836645746901,"score_gpt":0.2650121723330967,"score_spread":0.2306738058756276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}