{"id":"W3003409247","doi":"10.1177/0021998320902243","title":"Experimental investigation of failure mechanisms and evaluation of physical/mechanical properties of unidirectional flax–epoxy composites","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Composite Materials","topic":"Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Materials science; Composite material; Epoxy; Finite element method; Composite number; Fiber; Fiber-reinforced composite; Tension (geology); Fibre-reinforced plastic; Shear (geology); Material Design; Composite epoxy material; Compression (physics); Structural engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008166041,0.0001945488,0.0007462374,0.000131382,0.00005306843,0.00005292367,0.0002764064,0.00008124215,0.00008922181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008087303,0.0001512037,0.0001152189,0.0001687973,0.0001779254,0.0004479686,0.0001422298,0.00009409123,0.00000243747],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004742534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000101739,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001723949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.791294e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971383,0.0004307266,0.001092471,0.0001701062,0.001031857,0.0001365519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973196,0.00009894567,0.001476051,0.0001298097,0.000859592,0.0001159776],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005073619,0.00005818569,0.00002460897,0.0002007414,0.00006036141,9.909235e-7,0.0009720529,0.0008558093,0.9958316,0.001428078,0.00002708326,0.00003309699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009486781,0.001055213,0.000195501,0.0004138102,0.0001661085,0.00004048936,0.0001313783,0.00172206,0.9942853,0.0009037108,0.000004342704,0.0001333934],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982931,0.0005990803,0.0002333549,0.0002739863,0.000231402,0.0003080505,0.00003159878,0.00001430627,0.00001511218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915428,0.000005440984,0.008243851,0.00003837164,0.0001398842,0.000004446844,0.00000719635,0.00001642624,0.00000162486],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008010496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6165908,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03433836645746901,"score_gpt":0.2650121723330967,"score_spread":0.2306738058756276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}