{"id":"W3003504911","doi":"10.18192/aporia.v11i2.4596","title":"Conflicting interests: Critiquing the place of “institutional reputation” in research ethics reviews","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Aporia","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Constructive; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Institutional review board; Process (computing); Public relations; Audience measurement; Political science; Informed consent; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Medicine; Computer science; Engineering; Alternative medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6537772,0.00118257,0.002928427,0.01014612,0.01507855,0.03476015,0.0099302,0.03843989,0.001810473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8267497,0.00218799,0.002269309,0.007989842,0.0872927,0.03138925,0.02019437,0.0420458,0.0009166604],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01766894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04850093,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00378224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007706021,"domain_scores_codex":[0.121647,0.8018436,0.03470736,0.007003033,0.03215137,0.002647623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.04577932,0.8826855,0.01882761,0.0134632,0.03580769,0.003436599],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000135637,0.00002801007,0.001814604,0.006002486,0.0003450491,0.002027891,0.1820043,0.0007793671,0.0004708339,0.638306,0.08776774,0.08031809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001052653,0.0001298978,0.00113965,0.02548729,0.0002617493,0.003128944,0.05372464,0.004629607,0.001193071,0.4428707,0.4670094,0.0003198108],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.005670158,0.02722971,0.05696385,0.8785175,0.01793132,0.0004095194,0.00003127346,0.0001238157,0.01312284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4511151,0.01933002,0.1107644,0.3875568,0.02255626,0.003320906,0.00004784531,0.0005710364,0.004737622],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9615601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4269544,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8981316880014558,"score_gpt":0.7257111523966624,"score_spread":0.1724205356047934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}