{"id":"W3003691606","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.01.003","title":"Thinking clearly about causal inferences of politically motivated reasoning: why paradigmatic study designs often undermine causal inference","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":176,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"William and Flora Hewlett Foundation","keywords":"Causal inference; Inference; Motivated reasoning; Causal reasoning; Excludability; Randomized experiment; Psychology; Causality (physics); Cognitive psychology; Causal structure; Rendering (computer graphics); Causal model; Social psychology; Psychology of reasoning; Politics; Epistemology; Computer science; Cognition; Verbal reasoning; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Econometrics; Economics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2276176,0.001627389,0.002368974,0.002389443,0.002985094,0.008176866,0.005426063,0.01204458,0.008298816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5127702,0.002062554,0.001614634,0.001424544,0.02959854,0.0227693,0.004335531,0.01663623,0.0015755],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003688102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006952274,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001351903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002113052,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8650135,0.1069566,0.004255604,0.01204029,0.01059134,0.001142749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3428228,0.5868515,0.02413101,0.02904448,0.01448103,0.0026692],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001166084,0.0003257755,0.005367051,0.002391577,0.001091635,0.000447173,0.006894408,0.002659839,0.002727802,0.8498476,0.01898545,0.1080956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001862272,0.00003632293,0.0009013219,0.0002066233,0.00008906466,0.00009772692,0.0002942105,0.00256237,0.0004810141,0.9920677,0.003049639,0.00002781355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04657698,0.01024037,0.5599495,0.3472958,0.005041393,0.0007853912,0.0004611732,0.0005102826,0.02913899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6985995,0.00332489,0.2361961,0.05474176,0.003958306,0.001514409,0.0001917393,0.0002310701,0.001242321],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7723824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.952485,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3379507608780334,"score_gpt":0.4920450660957146,"score_spread":0.1540943052176811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}