{"id":"W3003691606","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.01.003","title":"Thinking clearly about causal inferences of politically motivated reasoning: why paradigmatic study designs often undermine causal inference","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":176,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"William and Flora Hewlett Foundation","keywords":"Causal inference; Inference; Motivated reasoning; Causal reasoning; Excludability; Randomized experiment; Psychology; Causality (physics); Cognitive psychology; Causal structure; Rendering (computer graphics); Causal model; Social psychology; Psychology of reasoning; Politics; Epistemology; Computer science; Cognition; Verbal reasoning; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Econometrics; Economics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00127983,0.0002373663,0.0004535879,0.000193898,0.0005666887,0.0002355378,0.001058007,0.0001394753,0.0002584628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007222681,0.0002071931,0.00008542,0.001627176,0.0017496,0.000640872,0.0001747249,0.0003773933,0.00001779567],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001058785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005024222,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006370262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000897572,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960709,0.000779272,0.0007423906,0.0005941777,0.001115169,0.0006981397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987441,0.0003162623,0.0003098844,0.0001498836,0.0001722794,0.000307561],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003052135,0.0009994328,0.8534009,0.00003258852,0.000008551086,0.000002598069,0.06508312,0.00002298129,0.0001117753,0.07516768,0.0006044509,0.004535404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001199413,0.003563177,0.9158055,0.0007300159,0.00005152519,0.000001560414,0.0621187,0.0004270063,0.00003738625,0.01250699,0.002799035,0.0007596629],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917501,0.0002939474,0.0003739251,0.00278688,0.002565131,0.0006634591,0.00001172271,0.0001083942,0.00144647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991558,0.0001196925,0.0001953868,0.0001361249,0.0003263571,0.0000391863,0.000006869987,0.000009242918,0.00001137981],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06266069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9629973,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3379507608780334,"score_gpt":0.4920450660957146,"score_spread":0.1540943052176811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}