{"id":"W3003995036","doi":"10.65109/ysvb9304","title":"Objective Social Choice: Using Auxiliary Information to Improve Voting Outcomes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Forecasting Techniques and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Computer science; Majority rule; Independent and identically distributed random variables; Inference; Artificial intelligence; Social choice theory; Set (abstract data type); Noise (video); Artificial neural network; Core (optical fiber); Normative; Machine learning; Data mining; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Random variable; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001192895,0.0002724396,0.0004817269,0.0003161797,0.000388074,0.0007899516,0.00113445,0.0002839052,0.0001216367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004251854,0.000213721,0.0002794565,0.0006747897,0.00004992385,0.0004302303,0.002540557,0.0005737523,0.0003280149],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001887377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002445122,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008095091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005265703,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969867,0.00006840855,0.001034326,0.0005921806,0.001048059,0.0002703537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975318,0.0005394372,0.0006773043,0.0004959502,0.0006138965,0.0001415671],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008209202,0.0001975456,0.03960822,0.0002174633,0.0002751612,0.00000402612,0.01864672,0.008420381,0.003022079,0.1131288,0.1719326,0.6444649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006058149,0.0001572675,0.1052304,0.0001438259,0.0001403049,0.000005570879,0.00381212,0.5275466,0.003578116,0.2967673,0.05979823,0.002214405],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1179334,0.000004026508,0.8444764,0.01190384,0.0008370602,0.001871394,0.0002894012,0.0007994471,0.02188504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8952882,3.183812e-7,0.1018262,0.002006347,0.0003314324,0.0001274627,0.00003115963,0.00001800036,0.0003708761],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7773548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8715292,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2027225112016032,"score_gpt":0.4560514468508209,"score_spread":0.2533289356492178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}