{"id":"W3004233575","doi":"10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110613","title":"The tip of the iceberg: Three case studies of spill risk assessments used in environmental impact statements","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marine Pollution Bulletin","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental impact statement; Grey literature; Work (physics); Environmental impact assessment; Environmental planning; The arctic; Risk assessment; Environmental resource management; Offshore drilling; Risk analysis (engineering); Submarine pipeline; Risk management; Environmental science; Business; Engineering; Computer science; Oceanography; Geology; Ecology; Political science; MEDLINE","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004899789,0.0002207512,0.0002815879,0.00001850104,0.0002814495,0.0000151038,0.00033995,0.00005516812,0.001802332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008327586,0.000134149,0.0001618123,0.0002127572,0.0006032276,0.00009318119,0.001084487,0.0002262895,0.00009521755],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005022578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001219832,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003277056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009733741,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980012,0.0002824582,0.0005476094,0.0002639355,0.0005718451,0.0003330229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990324,0.0001032675,0.0004585896,0.0002968876,0.000003218107,0.0001056359],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007902611,0.0001884725,0.9887377,0.000009549831,0.0001030166,0.00002443365,0.0006556321,0.001006484,0.003349809,0.0000151952,0.0006079063,0.005222785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001101568,0.0002753126,0.9931557,0.00001149377,0.00005135893,0.00001392204,0.001431922,0.0003537712,0.00158291,0.0003776906,0.001484136,0.0001601973],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969074,0.00005949059,0.00003129864,0.001400749,0.00009663741,0.0005003716,0.0001243108,0.00000887657,0.0008709168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991714,0.0002394005,0.0001457651,0.0001788999,0.00002172543,0.00002019085,0.000006497209,0.00001726519,0.0001988588],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005062588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991102,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02729413386940933,"score_gpt":0.3287389315715099,"score_spread":0.3014447977021006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}