{"id":"W3004233575","doi":"10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110613","title":"The tip of the iceberg: Three case studies of spill risk assessments used in environmental impact statements","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marine Pollution Bulletin","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental impact statement; Grey literature; Work (physics); Environmental impact assessment; Environmental planning; The arctic; Risk assessment; Environmental resource management; Offshore drilling; Risk analysis (engineering); Submarine pipeline; Risk management; Environmental science; Business; Engineering; Computer science; Oceanography; Geology; Ecology; Political science; MEDLINE","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03256916,0.0005545159,0.0007107198,0.003262566,0.01279481,0.009430492,0.002103649,0.005322402,0.002773556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05586931,0.0004315027,0.001142299,0.006872247,0.00685073,0.006584461,0.006623241,0.005561706,0.0005294207],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01396578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008659217,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05593216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0978919,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9746431,0.01791663,0.001172941,0.0005221883,0.004130613,0.001614484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9265913,0.05803532,0.00326558,0.002428389,0.007791659,0.001887768],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001542841,0.001930754,0.0654768,0.003062086,0.0003210579,0.05289964,0.4750948,0.02128409,0.002572066,0.21178,0.04236365,0.1216721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002313066,0.001094467,0.02835325,0.003484411,0.0002687159,0.004192019,0.6880352,0.006845339,0.003938278,0.03540982,0.227951,0.0001962223],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8193641,0.004000788,0.01418348,0.02763773,0.0004308414,0.001476564,0.0004658528,0.00005927802,0.1323814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9694875,0.003628821,0.01247845,0.00266026,0.00008518756,0.0005645723,0.0002303913,0.00007138468,0.01079335],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05593216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1722442,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02729413386940933,"score_gpt":0.3287389315715099,"score_spread":0.3014447977021006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}