{"id":"W3004264277","doi":"10.1002/asl.958","title":"Understanding the dynamic nature of risk in climate change assessments—A new starting point for discussion","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atmospheric Science Letters","topic":"Climate change impacts on agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Risk analysis (engineering); Vulnerability (computing); Climate change; Risk assessment; Computer science; Risk management; Point (geometry); Business; Ecology; Computer security; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":{"n_in":1,"stratum":"aff_core","weight":5595.2375,"opus":{"tier":"T2","genre":"conceptual","about_ca":false,"confidence":"low","reason":"Critique of the risk framework the IPCC uses in climate assessments, calling for standardization of the methods used to quantify risk; borderline between assessment methodology and domain climate-risk theory."},"gpt":{"tier":"OUT","genre":"conceptual","about_ca":false,"confidence":"high","reason":"It develops a conceptual framework for climate risk rather than studying research practice."},"grok":{"tier":"OUT","genre":"conceptual","about_ca":false,"confidence":"high","reason":"Conceptual paper on IPCC climate-risk frameworks, not metaresearch on how research is done or evaluated."}},"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04129519,0.001528832,0.00227081,0.003407867,0.00419686,0.01804665,0.005732692,0.01091479,0.005701237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03436002,0.0008374989,0.002099239,0.002473925,0.03951086,0.04179393,0.009316058,0.02212604,0.0007191135],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0127469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009606948,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008173254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006310578,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9775141,0.01595046,0.0009063304,0.001392773,0.003411307,0.0008249815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9519702,0.03800343,0.001956297,0.002188922,0.004668633,0.001212513],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002327599,0.00003384351,0.0004798767,0.0003837451,0.00005458647,0.0001623276,0.004185895,0.005604739,0.0003457115,0.9654075,0.006845626,0.01647298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005747647,0.00002611028,0.0002646121,0.001027641,0.00001409018,0.0001049945,0.005733829,0.003621384,0.000183588,0.9315134,0.05745478,0.00004973797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.009517761,0.04265217,0.2516551,0.6657891,0.004315483,0.000086821,0.000165274,0.0001028838,0.02571542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6341456,0.09093476,0.183155,0.06292329,0.01886036,0.0005806974,0.0002943398,0.0005714477,0.008534613],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04129519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08077713035751255,"score_gpt":0.2986775141636145,"score_spread":0.217900383806102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}